Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Is It Necessary to Evaluate Nuclei in HER2 FISH Evaluation?
by
Jaén, Joaquín
, Llobera, Montserrat
, Salvadó, Maria T.
, Korzynska, Anna
, Garcia-Rojo, Marcial
, López, Carlos
, Bosch, Ramón
, Lejeune, Marylène
, Alvaro, Tomás
, Tomás, Barbara
in
Biopsy
/ Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Breast Neoplasms - genetics
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - pathology
/ Centromere - genetics
/ Centromere - pathology
/ Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
/ Observer Variation
/ Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
/ Reproducibility of Results
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Is It Necessary to Evaluate Nuclei in HER2 FISH Evaluation?
by
Jaén, Joaquín
, Llobera, Montserrat
, Salvadó, Maria T.
, Korzynska, Anna
, Garcia-Rojo, Marcial
, López, Carlos
, Bosch, Ramón
, Lejeune, Marylène
, Alvaro, Tomás
, Tomás, Barbara
in
Biopsy
/ Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Breast Neoplasms - genetics
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - pathology
/ Centromere - genetics
/ Centromere - pathology
/ Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
/ Observer Variation
/ Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
/ Reproducibility of Results
2013
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Is It Necessary to Evaluate Nuclei in HER2 FISH Evaluation?
by
Jaén, Joaquín
, Llobera, Montserrat
, Salvadó, Maria T.
, Korzynska, Anna
, Garcia-Rojo, Marcial
, López, Carlos
, Bosch, Ramón
, Lejeune, Marylène
, Alvaro, Tomás
, Tomás, Barbara
in
Biopsy
/ Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Breast Neoplasms - genetics
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis
/ Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - genetics
/ Cell Nucleus - pathology
/ Centromere - genetics
/ Centromere - pathology
/ Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
/ Observer Variation
/ Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
/ Reproducibility of Results
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Is It Necessary to Evaluate Nuclei in HER2 FISH Evaluation?
Journal Article
Is It Necessary to Evaluate Nuclei in HER2 FISH Evaluation?
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A new method that simplifies the evaluation of the traditional HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) evaluation in breast cancer was proposed. HER2 status was evaluated in digital images (DIs) captured from 423 invasive breast cancer stained sections. All centromeric/CEP17 and HER2 gene signals obtained from separated stacked DIs were manually counted on the screen. The global ratios were compared with the traditional FISH evaluation and the immunohistochemical status. The 2 FISH scores were convergent in 96.93% of cases, showing an “almost perfect” agreement with a weighted k of 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.928-0.985). The new method evaluates at least 3 times more nuclei than traditional methods and also has an almost perfect agreement with the immunohistochemical scores. The proposed enhanced method substantially improves HER2 FISH assessment in breast cancer biopsy specimens because the evaluation of HER2/CEP17 copy numbers is more representative, easier, and faster than the conventional method.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.