MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data
Journal Article

Improving the estimation of the Boyce index using statistical smoothing methods for evaluating species distribution models with presence‐only data

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Species distribution models (SDMs) underpin a wide range of decisions concerning biodiversity. Although SDMs can be built using presence‐only data, rigorous evaluation of these models remains challenging. One evaluation method is the Boyce index (BI), which uses the relative frequencies between presence sites and background sites within a series of bins or moving windows spanning the entire range of predicted values from the SDM. Obtaining accurate estimates of the BI using these methods relies upon having a large number of presences, which is often not feasible, particularly for rare or restricted species that are often the focus of modelling. Wider application of the BI requires a method that can accurately and reliably estimate the BI using small numbers of presence records. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of five statistical smoothing methods (i.e. thin plate regression splines, cubic regression splines, B‐splines, P‐splines and adaptive smoothers) and the mean of these five methods (denoted as ‘mean') to estimate the BI. We simulated 600 species with varying prevalence and built distribution models using random forest and Maxent methods. For training data, we used two levels for the number of presences (NPtrain: 20 and 500), along with 2 × NPtrain and 10000 random points (i.e. random background sites) for each modelling method. We used the number of presences at four levels (NPbi: 1000, 200, 50 and 10) to investigate its effect, together with 5000 random points to calculate the BI. Our results indicate that the BI estimates from the binning and moving window methods are severely affected by the decrease of NPbi, but all the estimates of the BI from smoothing‐based methods were almost always unbiased for realistic situations. Hence, we recommend these methods for estimating the BI for evaluating SDMs when verified absence data are unavailable.