Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
by
Havenga, Henno
, Piketh, Stuart J
, Burger, Roelof R
, Coetzee, Ben
in
Athletes
/ Biometeorology
/ Climate
/ Environmental conditions
/ Heat
/ Heat exchange
/ Heat stress
/ Heat tolerance
/ Marathons
/ Metabolism
/ Physiological responses
/ Physiology
/ Running
/ Thermal comfort
/ Track & field
/ Ultramarathon
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
by
Havenga, Henno
, Piketh, Stuart J
, Burger, Roelof R
, Coetzee, Ben
in
Athletes
/ Biometeorology
/ Climate
/ Environmental conditions
/ Heat
/ Heat exchange
/ Heat stress
/ Heat tolerance
/ Marathons
/ Metabolism
/ Physiological responses
/ Physiology
/ Running
/ Thermal comfort
/ Track & field
/ Ultramarathon
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
by
Havenga, Henno
, Piketh, Stuart J
, Burger, Roelof R
, Coetzee, Ben
in
Athletes
/ Biometeorology
/ Climate
/ Environmental conditions
/ Heat
/ Heat exchange
/ Heat stress
/ Heat tolerance
/ Marathons
/ Metabolism
/ Physiological responses
/ Physiology
/ Running
/ Thermal comfort
/ Track & field
/ Ultramarathon
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
Journal Article
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We value comments on our research paper in a Commentary in this issue (Simpson, S Afr J Sci. 2024;120(1/2), Art. #16445). Acknowledging the Universal Thermal Comfort Index (UTCI)'s limitations in capturing individual physiological responses remains important; however, we argue for its appropriateness based on recent thermophysiology and heat exchange advancements during its development and broader alignment with standardised indexing efforts. Our original research paper set out with these considerations in mind, and our conclusions remain valid. We further argue for refinement of the UTCI for specific activities instead of using the PET. Finally, future efforts should focus on monitoring data in real-world scenarios to validate and improve thermal indices.
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.