Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
by
Buicko, Jessica L.
, Parks, Jonathan J.
, Namias, Nicholas
, Soe-Lin, Hahn
, Parreco, Joshua
, Byerly, Saskya
, Chatoor, Matthew
, Rattan, Rishi
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Collaboration
/ Creatinine
/ Electronic health records
/ Electronic medical records
/ Kidneys
/ Learning algorithms
/ Linear equations
/ Machine learning
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Trends
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
by
Buicko, Jessica L.
, Parks, Jonathan J.
, Namias, Nicholas
, Soe-Lin, Hahn
, Parreco, Joshua
, Byerly, Saskya
, Chatoor, Matthew
, Rattan, Rishi
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Collaboration
/ Creatinine
/ Electronic health records
/ Electronic medical records
/ Kidneys
/ Learning algorithms
/ Linear equations
/ Machine learning
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Trends
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
by
Buicko, Jessica L.
, Parks, Jonathan J.
, Namias, Nicholas
, Soe-Lin, Hahn
, Parreco, Joshua
, Byerly, Saskya
, Chatoor, Matthew
, Rattan, Rishi
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Collaboration
/ Creatinine
/ Electronic health records
/ Electronic medical records
/ Kidneys
/ Learning algorithms
/ Linear equations
/ Machine learning
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Trends
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
Journal Article
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Prior studies have used vital signs and laboratory measurements with conventional modeling techniques to predict acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study was to use the trend in vital signs and laboratory measurements with machine learning algorithms for predicting AKI in ICU patients. The eICU Collaborative Research Database was queried for five consecutive days of laboratory measurements per patient. Patients with AKI were identified and trends in vital signs and laboratory values were determined by calculating the slope of the least-squares-fit linear equation using three days for each value. Different machine learning classifiers (gradient boosted trees [GBT], logistic regression, and deep learning) were trained to predict AKI using the laboratory values, vital signs, and slopes. There were 151,098 ICU stays identified and the rate of AKI was 5.6 per cent. The best performing algorithm was GBT with an AUC of 0.834 ± 0.006 and an F-measure of 42.96 per cent ± 1.26 per cent. Logistic regression performed with an AUC of 0.827 ± 0.004 and an F-measure of 28.29 per cent ± 1.01 per cent. Deep learning performed with an AUC of 0.817 ± 0.005 and an F-measure of 42.89 per cent ± 0.91 per cent. The most important variable for GBT was the slope of the minimum creatinine (30.32%). This study identifies the best performing machine learning algorithms for predicting AKI using trends in laboratory values in ICU patients. Early identification of these patients using readily available data indicates that incorporating machine learning predictive models into electronic medical record systems is an inevitable requisite for improving patient outcomes.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.