Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Value of abdominal ultrasound in management of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Value of abdominal ultrasound in management of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Value of abdominal ultrasound in management of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Value of abdominal ultrasound in management of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2018
Overview
PurposeNecrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a life-threatening disease among infants in the NICU. Early diagnosis and careful monitoring are essential to improve outcomes. Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) seems a promising addition to current diagnostic modalities, but its clinical utility is uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify AUS features associated with definite NEC (i.e. Bell stage ≥ II), failed medical treatment, surgery, and death.MethodsEmbase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched for studies that addressed any NEC-related AUS feature in relation to any of the four outcomes. After critical appraisal of relevant study methods, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model.Results15 out of 1215 studies were included. All AUS features had sensitivities below 70% and specificities largely above 80% for diagnosing definite NEC; several AUS features were significantly associated with failed medical treatment and surgery. Substantial heterogeneity, poor reporting quality and uncertain risk of bias were found.ConclusionsWhile clear associations of AUS features with failed medical treatment exist and AUS may detect definite NEC, substantial heterogeneity, poor reporting quality and an uncertain risk of bias impair the use of AUS for clinical decision making. A prospective, well-designed validation study is needed.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
