MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study
Journal Article

Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study

2017
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Recent clinical trials demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) using second-generation endovascular devices has beneficial effects in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, it remains controversial if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is superior compared to direct mechanical thrombectomy (DMT). The aims of this study were to compare short and long-term outcomes between IVT + MT and DMT patients. We prospectively recruited AIS patients with LVO in the anterior or posterior circulation eligible for MT with and without prior IVT. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality were assessed at baseline, at discharge, 90-days and 1-year after stroke. Favorable outcome was defined as a mRS score ≤2. Of the 66 patients included, 33 (50%) were in IVT + MT group and 33 (50%) were in DMT group. Except for a higher prevalence of patients using anticoagulants at admission in DMT group, baseline characteristics did not differ in the two groups. Procedural characteristics were similar in IVT + MT and DMT group. Rate of favorable outcome was significantly higher in IVT + MT patients than DMT ones both 90-days (51.5 vs. 18.2%; p = 0.004) and 1-year (51.5 vs. 15.2%; p = 0.002) after stroke. DMT patients were six times more likely to die during the 1-year follow-up compared to IVT + MT patients. This study suggests that bridging therapy may improve short and long-term outcomes in patients eligible for endovascular treatment. Further studies with larger patient numbers and randomized design are needed to confirm our findings.