Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review
Do you wish to request the book?
Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review
2017
Overview
Purpose
Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve injury is a common complication following hamstring graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The direction of skin incision performed at proximal tibial metaphysis may affect the rate of iatrogenic nerve damage. Aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate evidence that would substantiate the adoption of one incision over another for hamstring graft harvesting.
Methods
The available literature was systematically screened searching studies dealing with iatrogenic injury to the saphenous nerve after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. A search was performed using the keywords “Saphenous” and “Infrapatellar branch” in combination with “Anterior cruciate ligament”, “arthroscopy” and “hamstrings”, supplying no limits regard the publication year. Coleman methodological score was performed in all the retained articles.
Results
Five articles matched the inclusion criteria. There were two randomized controlled trials, one prospective comparative study and two retrospective comparative series. Poor methodological quality was found overall. A vertical incision was found to significantly affect the presence of hypoesthesia and the extent of the area of sensory loss in three articles; no difference was registered in one, and a trend towards a lower rate of iatrogenic nerve damage using an oblique incision was found in the remaining one, without any statistical significance.
Conclusion
Although the low methodological quality of the analysed studies does not permit to draw definitive conclusions, the anatomical course of the nerve along with the results obtained in the available studies seems to suggest lower rate of neurological impairment adopting an oblique incision. This kind of incision may therefore be preferred in the routine clinical practice.
Level of evidence
Systematic review, Level II.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subject
