Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Starter Packs Versus Full Prescription of Antiretroviral Drugs for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
by
Irvine, Cadi
, Shubber, Zara
, Beanland, Rachel L.
, Ford, Nathan
, Venter, Francois
in
Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use
/ Antiretroviral agents
/ Antiretroviral drugs
/ Clinical trials
/ Drug Prescriptions
/ HIV
/ HIV Infections - prevention & control
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Medication Adherence
/ Meta-analysis
/ Observational Studies as Topic
/ Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
/ Prophylaxis
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ World Health Organization
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Starter Packs Versus Full Prescription of Antiretroviral Drugs for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
by
Irvine, Cadi
, Shubber, Zara
, Beanland, Rachel L.
, Ford, Nathan
, Venter, Francois
in
Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use
/ Antiretroviral agents
/ Antiretroviral drugs
/ Clinical trials
/ Drug Prescriptions
/ HIV
/ HIV Infections - prevention & control
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Medication Adherence
/ Meta-analysis
/ Observational Studies as Topic
/ Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
/ Prophylaxis
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ World Health Organization
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Starter Packs Versus Full Prescription of Antiretroviral Drugs for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
by
Irvine, Cadi
, Shubber, Zara
, Beanland, Rachel L.
, Ford, Nathan
, Venter, Francois
in
Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use
/ Antiretroviral agents
/ Antiretroviral drugs
/ Clinical trials
/ Drug Prescriptions
/ HIV
/ HIV Infections - prevention & control
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Medication Adherence
/ Meta-analysis
/ Observational Studies as Topic
/ Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
/ Prophylaxis
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ World Health Organization
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Starter Packs Versus Full Prescription of Antiretroviral Drugs for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
Journal Article
Starter Packs Versus Full Prescription of Antiretroviral Drugs for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background. The provision of starter packs for human immunodeficiency virus postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is practiced in many settings to facilitate rapid initiation by nonexperts and encourage adherence. However, the impact of starter packs on PEP completion rates has not been systematically assessed. We systematically reviewed the evidence on outcomes associated with starter packs for PEP compared to full prescriptions. Methods. Four databases and 2 conference abstract sites were searched up to December 2013; this search was updated in 1 database in June 2014. PEP completion rates, stratified by prescribing practice, were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Results. Fifty-four studies provided data on 11 714 PEP initiations. Thirty-seven studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 34 observational cohorts, provided information on starter packs (although none of the RCTs specifically assessed starter packs), and 17 studies, including 2 RCTs and 15 observational cohorts, provided information on full prescriptions. Overall, outcomes were better when participants were offered a full 28-day course of PEP at initial presentation to healthcare, with fewer refusals (11.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.3%–17.5%] vs 22% [95% CI, 16.7%–28.1%]) and higher completion rates (70% [95% CI, 56.7%–77.3%] vs 53.2% [95% CI, 44.4%–62.2%]). More than a quarter (28% [95% CI, 21.4%–34.5%]) of individuals provided with a PEP starter pack failed to return for their subsequent appointment and therefore defaulted prior to receiving a full course of PEP. The quality of the evidence overall was rated as very low. Conclusions. The findings of this review suggest that starter packs do not improve adherence to PEP and may result in lower adherence and completion rates.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.