Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging
Do you wish to request the book?
Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging
2020
Overview
PurposePercutaneous paraspinal pedicle screw implantation (PPSI) reduces soft tissue trauma, blood loss, and postoperative pain but remains technically challenging and associated with radiation exposure and implant-related artefacts. Here, we determined the feasibility, screw accessibility, and the accuracy of navigated PPSI in the thoraco-lumbar sacral spine using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) and robotic cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging.MethodsBetween 2015 and 2018, 465 percutaneous paraspinal pedicle screws were implanted in 75 patients using iCT- or CBCT-based spinal navigation with 230 screws connected to rod reducers during screw assessment imaging (iCT 198; CBCT 32). Clinical and demographic data, intraoperative screw accessibility, and screw accuracy were analyzed and compared to a case-matched cohort of 75 patients undergoing navigated implantation of 481 pedicle screws through an open midline approach.ResultsBoth iCT and CBCT permitted reliable assessment of each implanted screw, regardless of artifacts caused by rod reducers. Although overall accuracy for correct placement was comparable between PPSI and open surgery (PPSI 96.6%; Open 94.2%), PPSI compared favorably to open surgery regarding complete placement within the pedicle (PPSI 90.1%; Open 75.1%; p < 0.0001), regional placement accuracy in the lumbar (PPSI 97.8%; Open 91.5%; p < 0.001), and lumbar-sacral spine (PPSI 100%; Open 81.2%; p < 0.05), next to the duration of surgery and length of hospitalization.ConclusionsPPSI with iCT- and CBCT-based spinal navigation improves the accuracy, safety, and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation. Next, a cost-effectiveness and outcome analysis should determine whether iCT and CBCT imaging are truly economically justified.Graphic abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
