Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Myringotomy and tube insertion combined with balloon eustachian tuboplasty for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Myringotomy and tube insertion combined with balloon eustachian tuboplasty for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children
Do you wish to request the book?
Myringotomy and tube insertion combined with balloon eustachian tuboplasty for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Myringotomy and tube insertion combined with balloon eustachian tuboplasty for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children
2020
Overview
Objective
This study aimed to clarify the role and safety of balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) in the treatment of otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.
Methods
This retrospective study was performed between January 2017 and February 2018. The study covered 25 OME patients treated with BET combined with myringotomy and tube insertion (MTI), designated as the BET group, and 24 OME patients treated with MTI during the same period considered as the controls. In addition, all patients received adenoidectomy if found with adenoid hypertrophy. The air–bone conduction gap (ABG) and curative effect were compared between the two groups. Tubomanometry (TMM) results were recorded preoperatively to confirm existence of eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Otologic history and examination results of all patients were carefully recorded before the operation, at 6, 12 and 18 months postoperatively.
Results
Six months after surgery, ABG difference between the two groups was less than 1 dB HL. At 12 months after the operation, ABG in the BET group was smaller than that in the control group. There was a marked ABG deterioration (from 10.1 to 15.9 dB HL) in the control group compared to that in BET. Statistically significant differences in ABG difference between the two groups were observed 18 months after surgery with cured and total effective rates of BET at 76.1 and 93.5%, respectively. In the control group, these rates were 60.9 and 89.1% respectively. No serious complications and tympanic perforations were found in all subjects.
Conclusion
MTI combined with BET is effective and safe in the treatment of children with OME. Compared to simple MTI, application of BET can effectively extend improvement period and increase cured rate, especially after removal of the ventilation tube. Directly benefit from the ventilation tube, the curative effect was close during the period of tube retention. Considering the sample size and follow-up time of this study, related studies targeting large cohorts are needed in the future to validate the benefits of BET in children with OME.
