Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition
in
Animal cognition
/ Animals
/ Associative learning
/ Cognitive ability
/ Concept learning
/ Learning
/ Monkeys & apes
/ Philosophers
/ Repetition
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition
in
Animal cognition
/ Animals
/ Associative learning
/ Cognitive ability
/ Concept learning
/ Learning
/ Monkeys & apes
/ Philosophers
/ Repetition
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition
Journal Article
Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The ability to learn and flexibly apply sophisticated concepts is thought by many to be what differentiates humans from all other animals. A basic assumption underlying this belief is that some “lower-order” associative learning mechanisms link perceptual events to specific reactions, whereas the kinds of verbalizable concepts that humans form depend on “higher-order” cognitive processes that rely less on perception and more on rational thought. Evidence in support of this interpretation comes largely from experiments in which animals either fail to learn or generalize concepts that humans readily learn, or learn them with great difficulty. Here, we argue that the formation of generalizable relational concepts may depend more on an individual’s capacity to shift attention than on the possession of representational processes that are unique to humans. Studies of relational concept learning in non-human animals show that they can learn generalizable concepts when conditions are favorable. In particular, repetition of similar training experiences appears to facilitate attentional redirection, thereby enabling animals to flexibly reenact past events and to judge the similarity of items within stimulus sets. The conditions that promote concept learning in humans may differ substantially from those experienced by most other animals. This does not imply, however, that either (1) conceptual learning mechanisms differ qualitatively from other learning mechanisms, or (2) that the processes that lead to concept formation in humans differ significantly from those present in other species.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.