MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients
Journal Article

A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective This study aimed to distinguish tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) from pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) based on laboratory, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) findings. Further, a novel diagnostic model for differential diagnosis was developed. Methods We obtained MRI, CT and laboratory data from TS and PS patients. Predictive models were built using binary logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed. Both internal and external validation was performed. Results A total of 81 patients with PS ( n  = 46) or TS ( n  = 35) were enrolled. All patients had etiological evidence from the focal lesion. Disc signal or height preservation, skip lesion or multi segment (involved segments ≥ 3) involvement, paravertebral calcification, massive sequestra formation, subligamentous bone destruction, bone erosion with osteosclerotic margin, higher White Blood Cell Count (WBC) and positive result of tuberculosis infection T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) were more prevalent in the TS group. A diagnostic model was developed and included four predictors: WBC<7.265 * (10^9/L), skip lesion or involved segments ≥ 3, massive sequestra formation and subligamentous bone destruction. The model showed good sensitivity, specificity, and total accuracy (91.4%, 95.7%, and 93.8%, respectively); the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.981, similar to the results of internal validation using bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) and external validation set, indicating good clinical predictive ability. Conclusions This study develop a good diagnostic model based on both CT and MRI, as well as laboratory findings, which may help clinicians distinguish between TS and PS.