Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and body composition in Parkinson’s disease: are they good predictors of disability?: a case–control study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and body composition in Parkinson’s disease: are they good predictors of disability?: a case–control study
Do you wish to request the book?
Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and body composition in Parkinson’s disease: are they good predictors of disability?: a case–control study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and body composition in Parkinson’s disease: are they good predictors of disability?: a case–control study
2020
Overview
Background/aimTo assess sarcopenia and dynapenia and their relationship with disease severity and disabilities in PD and to state body composition in PD.MethodsWe conducted a case–control, cross-sectional study that included 70 patients with idiopathic PD and 85 controls. Sarcopenia was defined according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) criteria. Dynapenia was detected by a handheld dynamometer. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) was performed, and the SARC-F questionnaire was applied. Disabilities were appointed according to the Katz and Lawton indexes.ResultsSarcopenia and dynapenia were more prevalent in PD than in controls (50 vs 30.6% and 31.4 vs 17.6%, respectively). Dynapenia was significantly associated with the severity of the disease and disabilities (p = 0.047, p = 0.001); however, sarcopenia was not. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI), fat mass index (FMI), and fat-free mass index (FFMI) did not differ between the PD and controls. FMI was lower in the advanced stages of the disease. Higher scores in the SARC-F questionnaire were significantly associated with disabilities and the severity of the disease (p < 0.001, p < 0.001).ConclusionMuscle strength was closely associated with the severity of the disease and disabilities in PD, but muscle mass was not. Sarcopenia, defined by the SARC-F questionnaire, was a good predictor of disabilities in PD, while the EWGSOP criteria were not. PD patients have a favorable body composition even in advanced stages of the disease with lower FMI and protected lean mass.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
