Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Undiagnosed sagittal synostosis as cause of “idiopathic” intracranial hypertension
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Undiagnosed sagittal synostosis as cause of “idiopathic” intracranial hypertension
Do you wish to request the book?
Undiagnosed sagittal synostosis as cause of “idiopathic” intracranial hypertension
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Undiagnosed sagittal synostosis as cause of “idiopathic” intracranial hypertension
2024
Overview
Purpose
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare condition in children, but if diagnosed needs to be promptly treated to avoid clinical sequalae. The main purpose of this paper was to test our clinical experience with a cohort of normocephalic children with craniosynostosis who do not present in the routine way to craniofacial services, due to the normal head shape and age, diagnosed with IIH.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed all children who were referred to neurosurgery from 2012 to 2022 for management of IIH on our prospectively kept database. We determined what treatments were offered and if there was an associated craniosynostosis.
Results
In total, 19 children were identified with an average age at referral of 11.5 years (st dev 4.0 years) with 11 male and 8 female. The most common presenting symptoms and signs were papilloedema (18/19), headaches (15/19), visual deterioration (9/19), nausea and vomiting (7/19) and diplopia (4/19). Five out of 19 children (26.3%) had a sagittal suture fused that was not identified at the time of treatment and all children were normocephalic.
Conclusion
There is a cohort of children with IIH who will have concomitant craniosynostosis and ideally would benefit from cranial vault expansion as primary surgery rather than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. We suggest all children with IIH requiring neurosurgical intervention have cross-sectional imaging to look for occult craniosynostosis prior to intervention.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
