Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A survey of non-sedate practices when acquiring pediatric magnetic resonance imaging examinations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A survey of non-sedate practices when acquiring pediatric magnetic resonance imaging examinations
Do you wish to request the book?
A survey of non-sedate practices when acquiring pediatric magnetic resonance imaging examinations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A survey of non-sedate practices when acquiring pediatric magnetic resonance imaging examinations
2024
Overview
BackgroundImproving access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in childhood can be facilitated by making it faster and cheaper and reducing need for sedation or general anesthesia (GA) to mitigate motion. Some children achieve diagnostic quality MRI without GA through the use of non- practices fostering their cooperation and/or alleviating anxiety. Employed before and during MRI, these variably educate, distract, and/or desensitize patients to this environment.ObjectiveTo assess current utilization of non-sedate practices in pediatric MRI, including variations in practice and outcomes.Materials and methodsA survey-based study was conducted with 1372 surveys emailed to the Society for Pediatric Radiology members in February 2021, inviting one response per institution.ResultsResponses from 50 unique institutions in nine countries revealed 49/50 (98%) sites used ≥ 1 non-sedate practice, 48/50 (96%) sites in infants < 6 months, and 11/50 (22%) for children aged 6 months to 3 years. Non-sedate practices per site averaged 4.5 (range 0–10), feed and swaddle used at 47/49 (96%) sites, and child life specialists at 35/49 (71%). Average success rates were moderate (> 50–75%) across all sites and high (> 75–100%) for 20% of sites, varying with specific techniques. Commonest barriers to use were scheduling conflicts and limited knowledge.ConclusionNon-sedate practice utilization in pediatric MRI was near-universal but widely variable across sites, ages, and locales, with room for broader adoption. Although on average non-sedate practice success rates were similar, the range in use and outcomes suggest a need for standardized implementation guidelines, including patient selection and outcome metrics, to optimize utilization and inform educational initiatives.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
