Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of a Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC-CHX) Restoration Placed Using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique
by
Ratnayake, Jithendra
, Cannon, Richard D.
, Brunton, Paul A.
, Veerasamy, Arthi
, Loch, Carolina
, Ahmed, Hassan
, Coburn, David
, Heng, Nicholas C. K.
, Leung, Marcus
, Gray, Andrew R.
, Lyons, Karl M.
in
Acceptability
/ Antimicrobial agents
/ Cement
/ Chlorhexidine
/ Dental caries
/ Dentistry
/ Disease prevention
/ Glass ionomer cements
/ Lesions
/ Microorganisms
/ Older people
/ Oral hygiene
/ Questionnaires
/ Samples
/ Service restoration
/ Survival
/ Wool
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of a Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC-CHX) Restoration Placed Using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique
by
Ratnayake, Jithendra
, Cannon, Richard D.
, Brunton, Paul A.
, Veerasamy, Arthi
, Loch, Carolina
, Ahmed, Hassan
, Coburn, David
, Heng, Nicholas C. K.
, Leung, Marcus
, Gray, Andrew R.
, Lyons, Karl M.
in
Acceptability
/ Antimicrobial agents
/ Cement
/ Chlorhexidine
/ Dental caries
/ Dentistry
/ Disease prevention
/ Glass ionomer cements
/ Lesions
/ Microorganisms
/ Older people
/ Oral hygiene
/ Questionnaires
/ Samples
/ Service restoration
/ Survival
/ Wool
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of a Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC-CHX) Restoration Placed Using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique
by
Ratnayake, Jithendra
, Cannon, Richard D.
, Brunton, Paul A.
, Veerasamy, Arthi
, Loch, Carolina
, Ahmed, Hassan
, Coburn, David
, Heng, Nicholas C. K.
, Leung, Marcus
, Gray, Andrew R.
, Lyons, Karl M.
in
Acceptability
/ Antimicrobial agents
/ Cement
/ Chlorhexidine
/ Dental caries
/ Dentistry
/ Disease prevention
/ Glass ionomer cements
/ Lesions
/ Microorganisms
/ Older people
/ Oral hygiene
/ Questionnaires
/ Samples
/ Service restoration
/ Survival
/ Wool
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of a Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC-CHX) Restoration Placed Using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique
Journal Article
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of a Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC-CHX) Restoration Placed Using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of a modified glass ionomer cement placed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique to treat root caries, and to carry out microbiological analysis of the restored sites. Two clinically visible root surface carious lesions per participant were restored using ART. One was restored with commercial glass ionomer cement (GIC) (ChemFil® Superior, DENTSPLY, Konstonz, Germany) which acted as the control. The other carious root lesion was restored with the same GIC modified with 5% chlorhexidine digluconate (GIC-CHX; test). Patient acceptability and restoration survival rate were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Plaque and saliva samples around the test and control restorations were collected, and microbiological analysis for selected bacterial and fungal viability were completed at baseline, and after 1, 3, and 6 months. In total, 52 restorations were placed using GIC and GIC-CHX in 26 participants; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. After reviewing the restorations during their baseline appointments, participants indicated that they were satisfied with the appearance of the restorations (n = 25, 96%) and did not feel anxious during the procedure (n = 24, 92%). Forty-eight percent (n = 12) of the GIC-CHX restorations were continuous with the existing anatomic form as opposed to six for the GIC restorations (24%), a difference which was statistically significant (p = 0.036). There was no statistically significant reduction in the mean count of the tested microorganisms in plaque samples for either type of restorations after 1, 3, or 6 months. Restoration of carious root surfaces with GIC-CHX resulted in higher survival rates than the control GIC. ART using GIC-CHX may therefore be a viable approach for use in outreach dental services to restore root surface carious lesions where dental services are not readily available, and for older people and special needs groups.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.