Journal Article

Geomechanical response to seasonal gas storage in depleted reservoirs: A case study in the Po River basin, Italy

Bagliani, A., Ferronato, M., Janna, C., Bottazzi, F., Castelletto, N., Cairo, E., Ferretti, A., Teatini, P., Marzorati, D., Gambolati, G., Colombo, D.

2011

Overview

Underground gas storage (UGS) in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs is a strategic practice to cope with the growing energy demand and occurs in many places in Europe and North America. In response to summer gas injection and winter gas withdrawal the reservoir expands and contracts essentially elastically as a major consequence of the fluid (gas and water) pore pressure fluctuations. Depending on a number of factors, including the reservoir burial depth, the difference between the largest and the smallest gas pore pressure, and the geomechanical properties of the injected formation and the overburden, the porous medium overlying the reservoir is subject to three‐dimensional deformation with the related cyclic motion of the land surface being both vertical and horizontal. We present a methodology to evaluate the environmental impact of underground gas storage and sequestration from the geomechanical perspective, particularly in relation to the ground surface displacements. Long‐term records of injected and removed gas volume and fluid pore pressure in the “Lombardia” gas field, northern Italy, are available together with multiyear detection of vertical and horizontal west‐east displacement of the land surface above the reservoir by an advanced permanent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar (PSInSAR) analysis. These data have been used to calibrate a 3‐D fluid‐dynamic model and develop a 3‐D transversally isotropic geomechanical model. The latter has been successfully implemented and used to reproduce the vertical and horizontal cyclic displacements, on the range of 8–10 mm and 6–8 mm, respectively, measured between 2003 and 2007 above the reservoir where a UGS program has been underway by Stogit‐Eni S.p.A. since 1986 following a 5 year field production life. Because of the great economical interest to increase the working gas volume as much as possible, the model addresses two UGS scenarios where the gas pore overpressure is pushed from the current 103%pi, where pi is the gas pore pressure prior to the field development, to 107%pi and 120%pi. Results of both scenarios show that there is a negligible impact on the ground surface, with deformation gradients that remain well below the most restrictive admissible limits for the civil structures and infrastructures. Key Points Evaluation of the environmental impact of UGS projects Set‐up and calibration of a 3‐D FE transversally isotropic geomechanical model PSInSAR analysis to measure vertical/horizontal movements of the land surface

• Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subject: 3-D geomechanical model / advanced PSInSAR / Deformation / Demand analysis / Depletion / Displacement / Dynamic models / Energy demand / Energy storage / Environmental impact / Gas injection / Geodetics / Geomechanics / Hydrology / Impact analysis / Interferometric synthetic aperture radar / land subidence/uplift / Oil and gas fields / Overpressure / Pore pressure / Pore water pressure / Porous media / Radar detection / Reservoir storage / Reservoirs / River basins / Satellites / Scientific apparatus & instruments / Three dimensional motion / underground gas storage / Underground storage / Underground storage tanks / vertical and horizontal displacements of the land surface