Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Different Donor Pathways for an Existing Donor Pool Still Underestimated—Perspective
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Different Donor Pathways for an Existing Donor Pool Still Underestimated—Perspective
Do you wish to request the book?
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Different Donor Pathways for an Existing Donor Pool Still Underestimated—Perspective
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Different Donor Pathways for an Existing Donor Pool Still Underestimated—Perspective
2025
Overview
The clinical pathway of a patient who experiences cardiac arrest and subsequently dies (with or without organ donation) is complex. It involves uncontrolled (u-) donation after circulatory death (DCD), controlled (c-) DCD, and donor after brain death (DBD). The present paper aims to summarize existing evidence on organ donation rates among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, with a focus on these three donor categories (uDCD, DBD, and cDCD). Furthermore, the potential to expand each donor pathway in OHCA patients will be highlighted, based on available evidence. Among non-survivor OHCA patients, the prevalence of brain death (BD) is estimated to be low, though reported data are not uniform. The diagnosis of BD is made 3 to 6 days after return of spontaneous circulation. The implementation of uDCD is known to be quite challenging due to logistical, ethical, and resource issues. Its rationale is still well grounded, mainly considering two factors: (a) the high incidence of OHCA, such that uDCD donors can be considered an existing pool of potential donors; (b) the uDCD pathway shows feasibility both under organizational (i.e., only lung uDCD program) and clinical views (normothermic regional perfusion, ex vivo machine perfusion, and an appropriate donor–recipient match). Controlled DCDs are donors who died after a planned withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). Data on the percentage of cDCD among OHCA patients is not uniform since the percentage of utilized cDCD has been estimated at around 10%. According to available evidence, each donor pathway in OHCA has the potential to be expanded, mainly by the identification of potential donors and the implementation of DCD programs.
Publisher
MDPI AG
