Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study
2021
Overview
BackgroundTwo-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is preferred for laparoscopic surgery. Recently, new generation three-dimensional (3D) HD and ultra-HD (4K) endovision systems are introduced to improve the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery. There is limited evidence on superiority of one technology over the others. This experimental trial was designed to evaluate 2D HD, 3D HD and 4K HD endovision systems in performance of standardized tasks.MethodsThis was a randomized, cross-over experimental study. Twenty-one surgical residents who were exposed to laparoscopic surgery were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned into three groups. Each group performed standardised tasks i.e. peg transfer, precision cutting, navigating in space and intra-corporeal suturing using 2D HD, 4K HD and 3D HD endovision systems on a box trainer. Procedures were recorded as 2D HD videos and analysed later. Participant’s perceived workload was assessed using Surg-TLX questionnaire. Primary endpoints were execution time in seconds and error score. Secondary endpoint was workload assessment.ResultsThe 3D HD had shorter execution time compared to 2D HD and 4K HD in all tasks except precision cutting (p = 0.004, 0.03, 0.001, 0.001 and p = 0.002, 0.191, 0.006, 0.005 in peg transfer, precision cutting, navigating in space and intra-corporeal suturing respectively). The 4K HD was significantly faster than 2D HD only in navigating in space task (p = 0.002). The error score between 3D HD and 4K HD were comparable in all tasks. The 2D HD had significantly more error scores compared to 4K HD, 3D HD in peg transfer task (p = 0.005, 0.014, respectively). 3D HD had significantly less workload than 2D HD and 4K HD in most of the dimensions of Surg-TLXConclusions3D HD endovision system in comparison to 2D HD and 4K HD, may lead to faster execution without compromising safety of a task and is associated with less workload.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.