Journal Article

Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor

Kostritsa Fedor, Ryan, Babbush, Quintana, Chris, Gidney, Craig, O’Brien Thomas E, Yeh Ping, Jamie, Yao Z, Buell, David A, Ho, Alan, Brooks, Foxen, Mohseni Masoud, Eppens, Daniel, Graff, Rob, Putterman Harald, Collins, Roberto, Lindmark, Mike, Niu Murphy Yuezhen, Sung, Kevin J, Martinis, John M, McEwen, Matt, Xiao, Mi, Zalcman, Adam, Kelly, Julian, Sank, Daniel, White, Theodore, Dunsworth, Andrew, Hong, Sabrina, Harrigan, Matthew P, Neven Hartmut, Zhou, Leo, Ostby, Eric, Farhi, Edward, Arya Kunal, Kafri Dvir, O’Gorman Bryan, Landhuis, David, Leib, Martin, Smelyanskiy Vadim, Laptev Pavel, Broughton, Michael, Streif, Michael, Fowler, Austin, Barends Rami, Habegger, Steve, Huang, Trent, Boixo Sergio, Giustina Marissa, Bacon, Dave, McClean, Jarrod R, Martin, Orion, Arute Frank, Atalaya Juan, Burkett, Brian, Mutus Josh, Bardin, Joseph C, Lucero, Erik, Kim, Seon, Strain, Doug, Chiaro, Ben, Ioffe, L B, Isakov, Sergei V, Korotkov, Alexander N, Mruczkiewicz Wojciech, Roushan Pedram, Courtney, William, Petukhov, Andre, Rubin, Nicholas C, Bushnell, Nicholas, Kechedzhi Kostyantyn, Chen, Yu, Neukart Florian, Naaman Ofer, Demura, Sean, Klimov,

2021

Overview

Faster algorithms for combinatorial optimization could prove transformative for diverse areas such as logistics, finance and machine learning. Accordingly, the possibility of quantum enhanced optimization has driven much interest in quantum technologies. Here we demonstrate the application of the Google Sycamore superconducting qubit quantum processor to combinatorial optimization problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Like past QAOA experiments, we study performance for problems defined on the planar connectivity graph native to our hardware; however, we also apply the QAOA to the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model and MaxCut, non-native problems that require extensive compilation to implement. For hardware-native problems, which are classically efficient to solve on average, we obtain an approximation ratio that is independent of problem size and observe that performance increases with circuit depth. For problems requiring compilation, performance decreases with problem size. Circuits involving several thousand gates still present an advantage over random guessing but not over some efficient classical algorithms. Our results suggest that it will be challenging to scale near-term implementations of the QAOA for problems on non-native graphs. As these graphs are closer to real-world instances, we suggest more emphasis should be placed on such problems when using the QAOA to benchmark quantum processors.It is hoped that quantum computers may be faster than classical ones at solving optimization problems. Here the authors implement a quantum optimization algorithm over 23 qubits but find more limited performance when an optimization problem structure does not match the underlying hardware.

• Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
• Subject: Algorithms / Combinatorial analysis / Gates (circuits) / Graph theory / Graphs / Hardware / Logistics / Machine learning / Microprocessors / Optimization / Optimization algorithms / Quantum computers / Qubits (quantum computing) / Superconductivity