Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Uncertainty Quantification in Data Fusion Classifier for Ship-Wake Detection
by
Sobien, Daniel
, Krometis, Justin
, Kauffman, Justin A.
, Garg, Ria
, Cheung, Winnie
, Costa, Maice
in
Algorithms
/ C band
/ Classification
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ data fusion
/ Data integration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ deep neural network
/ Entropy
/ Epistemology
/ Image classification
/ Image quality
/ Machine learning
/ Medical imaging equipment
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Neural networks
/ Performance enhancement
/ Physics
/ Predictions
/ Radar imaging
/ Remote sensing
/ Robustness
/ simulated data
/ Synthetic aperture radar
/ Testing time
/ Uncertainty
/ uncertainty quantification
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Uncertainty Quantification in Data Fusion Classifier for Ship-Wake Detection
by
Sobien, Daniel
, Krometis, Justin
, Kauffman, Justin A.
, Garg, Ria
, Cheung, Winnie
, Costa, Maice
in
Algorithms
/ C band
/ Classification
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ data fusion
/ Data integration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ deep neural network
/ Entropy
/ Epistemology
/ Image classification
/ Image quality
/ Machine learning
/ Medical imaging equipment
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Neural networks
/ Performance enhancement
/ Physics
/ Predictions
/ Radar imaging
/ Remote sensing
/ Robustness
/ simulated data
/ Synthetic aperture radar
/ Testing time
/ Uncertainty
/ uncertainty quantification
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Uncertainty Quantification in Data Fusion Classifier for Ship-Wake Detection
by
Sobien, Daniel
, Krometis, Justin
, Kauffman, Justin A.
, Garg, Ria
, Cheung, Winnie
, Costa, Maice
in
Algorithms
/ C band
/ Classification
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ data fusion
/ Data integration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ deep neural network
/ Entropy
/ Epistemology
/ Image classification
/ Image quality
/ Machine learning
/ Medical imaging equipment
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Neural networks
/ Performance enhancement
/ Physics
/ Predictions
/ Radar imaging
/ Remote sensing
/ Robustness
/ simulated data
/ Synthetic aperture radar
/ Testing time
/ Uncertainty
/ uncertainty quantification
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Uncertainty Quantification in Data Fusion Classifier for Ship-Wake Detection
Journal Article
Uncertainty Quantification in Data Fusion Classifier for Ship-Wake Detection
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Using deep learning model predictions requires not only understanding the model’s confidence but also its uncertainty, so we know when to trust the prediction or require support from a human. In this study, we used Monte Carlo dropout (MCDO) to characterize the uncertainty of deep learning image classification algorithms, including feature fusion models, on simulated synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images of persistent ship wakes. Comparing to a baseline, we used the distribution of predictions from dropout with simple mean value ensembling and the Kolmogorov—Smirnov (KS) test to classify in-domain and out-of-domain (OOD) test samples, created by rotating images to angles not present in the training data. Our objective was to improve the classification robustness and identify OOD images during the test time. The mean value ensembling did not improve the performance over the baseline, in that there was a –1.05% difference in the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) from the baseline model averaged across all SAR bands. The KS test, by contrast, saw an improvement of +12.5% difference in MCC and was able to identify the majority of OOD samples. Leveraging the full distribution of predictions improved the classification robustness and allowed labeling test images as OOD. The feature fusion models, however, did not improve the performance over the single SAR-band models, demonstrating that it is best to rely on the highest quality data source available (in our case, C-band).
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.