Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ḥasdai Crescas and Scholastic Philosophers on the Possible Existence of Multiple Simultaneous Worlds
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ḥasdai Crescas and Scholastic Philosophers on the Possible Existence of Multiple Simultaneous Worlds
Do you wish to request the book?
Ḥasdai Crescas and Scholastic Philosophers on the Possible Existence of Multiple Simultaneous Worlds
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Ḥasdai Crescas and Scholastic Philosophers on the Possible Existence of Multiple Simultaneous Worlds
2017
Overview
Scholars who examine the possible influence of scholastic writers on Crescas' treatment of the existence of multiple worlds have thus far focused on Nicole Oresme's Latin and French works. It is proposed here that Crescas may have been influenced by Thomas Aquinas' treatment of the multiple worlds. More specifically, Crescas' first two arguments for the existence of multiple worlds, presented in the fourth treatise of Or Hashem, are compared with Aquinas' arguments in his quaestio on the issue in the Summa Theologica. Given that these arguments share a common structure and appear in the same order in both works, it is plausible that Crescas relied on by Aquinas. The differences between them can be explained largely by Crescas' desire to adapt Aquinas' proofs to suit his own treatment of creation.
