Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
An overlooked source of skin dose perturbation: Commercial tattoo inks in radiotherapy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
An overlooked source of skin dose perturbation: Commercial tattoo inks in radiotherapy
Do you wish to request the book?
An overlooked source of skin dose perturbation: Commercial tattoo inks in radiotherapy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
An overlooked source of skin dose perturbation: Commercial tattoo inks in radiotherapy
2026
Overview
Approximately one-third of US adults have tattoos, yet the dosimetric impact of intradermal tattoo pigments during radiation therapy remains uncharacterized. Commercial tattoo inks contain unregulated metallic impurities including chromium, lead, and nickel, raising concerns about dose perturbations in tattooed skin. This work quantifies radiation dose perturbations induced by high-atomic-number (Z) tattoo pigments under clinically relevant radiotherapy conditions. Monte Carlo simulations (TOPAS) modeled layered skin phantoms with a 0.3-mm intradermal tattoo layer embedded at 1.25–1.55 mm depth. Three commercial inks were evaluated: carbon-based (black) and metal-containing (Fe-rich brown, Al-containing orange) at pigment loadings of 5–100 vol% within the tattoo layer, to establish upper-bound effects. Electron (6, 18 MeV) and photon (6, 18 MV) beams were simulated with standard clinical geometry (1 × 1 cm² field, SSD = 100 cm). Photon irradiation produced pronounced, depth-localized dose enhancement, with peak dose enhancement factor (DEF) reaching 2.5 for brown ink at 18 MV, a 62% mean increase relative to non-tattooed skin driven by high-Z–mediated secondary electron production. Electron beams exhibited energy-dependent behavior: 6 MeV produced modest enhancement (peak DEF ~ 1.07), while 18 MeV unexpectedly generated dose deficits (DEF < 1.0) due to enhanced lateral scattering. Critically, all perturbations remained depth-confined without lateral propagation, preserving spatial dose uniformity across tattooed and non-tattooed regions. Tattoo pigments containing toxic metals create substantial localized dose enhancements under photon irradiation but minimal perturbations under electron therapy. These modality-dependent effects represent a previously unrecognized source of dose uncertainty in radiotherapy and warrant consideration in treatment planning for the growing population of tattooed patients.
