Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessing hard and loose \endpoints\: comparison of patient and expert Bristol Stool Scale scoring of 2280 fecal samples version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations
by
Hagen, Milada
, Malmstrøm, Gunn Helen
, Dale, Hanna Fjeldheim
, Fiennes, Jennifer T.
, Kristensen, Vendel A.
, Valeur, Jørgen
, Høivik, Marte Lie
in
Adult
/ constipation
/ diarrhea
/ eng
/ Fecal sample
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ stool form assessment
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessing hard and loose \endpoints\: comparison of patient and expert Bristol Stool Scale scoring of 2280 fecal samples version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations
by
Hagen, Milada
, Malmstrøm, Gunn Helen
, Dale, Hanna Fjeldheim
, Fiennes, Jennifer T.
, Kristensen, Vendel A.
, Valeur, Jørgen
, Høivik, Marte Lie
in
Adult
/ constipation
/ diarrhea
/ eng
/ Fecal sample
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ stool form assessment
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessing hard and loose \endpoints\: comparison of patient and expert Bristol Stool Scale scoring of 2280 fecal samples version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations
by
Hagen, Milada
, Malmstrøm, Gunn Helen
, Dale, Hanna Fjeldheim
, Fiennes, Jennifer T.
, Kristensen, Vendel A.
, Valeur, Jørgen
, Høivik, Marte Lie
in
Adult
/ constipation
/ diarrhea
/ eng
/ Fecal sample
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ stool form assessment
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Assessing hard and loose \endpoints\: comparison of patient and expert Bristol Stool Scale scoring of 2280 fecal samples version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations
Journal Article
Assessing hard and loose \endpoints\: comparison of patient and expert Bristol Stool Scale scoring of 2280 fecal samples version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Stool consistency is an important outcome measure to evaluate in the investigation of several gastrointestinal diseases. The Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) is one of the most commonly used tools for evaluation of stool consistency. BSS ranges from 1-7 and each score is assigned to a given consistency of the feces. Self-reported characterizations can differ from an expert evaluation, and the reliability of BSS is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of BSS by comparing patient scores with expert scores.
Methods
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease collected stool samples throughout a 3-year follow-up. The stool´s consistency was evaluated with BSS by the patients and matched with an expert score. Agreement between patient and expert scores was assessed using Cohen's kappa.
Results
BSS scores from 2280 fecal samples collected from 992 patients at up to five time points were included. When all samples were compared, there was good to substantial agreement between patient and expert scores (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.66-0.72). When the BSS scores were simplified and categorized as 1 (scores 1-2), 2 (scores 3-5) or 3 (scores 6-7), the agreement improved slightly (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.73-0.77). When the scores from the first sample per patient were compared, the experts were more likely to assign higher scores compared to the patient. The proportion of the lowest assigned scores (1-2) was 12.1% for patients and 8.1% for experts.
Conclusions
The agreement between patient and expert BSS scores is good to substantial, especially when the BSS scores are simplified into three categories.
Publisher
F1000 Research Limited,F1000 Research Ltd
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.