Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Efficiency of Altruism and Egoism as Voting Strategies in Stochastic Environment
by
Lezina, Z. M
, Malyshev, V. A
, Tsodikov, Ya. Yu
, Loginov, A. K
, Afonkin, V. A
, Chebotarev, P. Yu
in
Altruism
/ Criteria
/ Efficiency
/ Extinction
/ Optimization
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Efficiency of Altruism and Egoism as Voting Strategies in Stochastic Environment
by
Lezina, Z. M
, Malyshev, V. A
, Tsodikov, Ya. Yu
, Loginov, A. K
, Afonkin, V. A
, Chebotarev, P. Yu
in
Altruism
/ Criteria
/ Efficiency
/ Extinction
/ Optimization
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative Efficiency of Altruism and Egoism as Voting Strategies in Stochastic Environment
Journal Article
Comparative Efficiency of Altruism and Egoism as Voting Strategies in Stochastic Environment
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In this paper, we study the efficiency of egoistic and altruistic strategies within the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) using two criteria: maximizing the average capital increment and minimizing the number of bankrupt participants. The proposals are generated stochastically; three families of the corresponding distributions are considered: normal distributions, symmetrized Pareto distributions, and Student’s t-distributions. It is found that the “pit of losses” paradox described earlier does not occur in the case of heavy-tailed distributions. The egoistic strategy better protects agents from extinction in aggressive environments than the altruistic ones, however, the efficiency of altruism is higher in more favorable environments. A comparison of altruistic strategies with each other shows that in aggressive environments, everyone should be supported to minimize extinction, while under more favorable conditions, it is more efficient to support the weakest participants. Studying the dynamics of participants’ capitals we identify situations where the two considered criteria contradict each other. At the next stage of the study, combined voting strategies and societies involving participants with selfish and altruistic strategies will be explored.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.