Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Applications of AI Tools in the Fields of Weather and Climate—Selected Examples
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Applications of AI Tools in the Fields of Weather and Climate—Selected Examples
Do you wish to request the book?
The Applications of AI Tools in the Fields of Weather and Climate—Selected Examples
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Applications of AI Tools in the Fields of Weather and Climate—Selected Examples
2025
Overview
Large language models (LLMs) based on artificial intelligence have found applications across various sectors—including medicine, education, science, literature, and marketing. Although they offer considerable opportunities, their limitations also raise important concerns. This study evaluates several AI tools in the context of meteorology and climatology. The tools examined include ChatGPT o3-mini, o1, 4.o, 4.0; Gemini Advanced 1.5 and 2.0; Copilot; Perplexity; DataAnalyst; Consensus; ScholarGPT; SciSpace; Claude; and DeepSeek. The evaluation tasks comprised cloud recognition and classification from photographs, gap-filling in literature reviews, map creation based on provided datasets, comparative interpretation of maps, and archival data retrieval from line graphs converted to numerical data. Each task was rated on a 0–5 scale. Conducted between February 2024 and February 2025, the study found that ChatGPT o3-mini excelled in cloud classification; ChatGPT4.o and ScholarGPT produced high-quality maps; Claude 3.5 Sonnet and SciSpace provided the most detailed map descriptions; and Consensus and ChatGPT o1 were the most effective for literature review support. However, all tools performed poorly in regards to archival data retrieval, with Claude 3.5 Sonnet yielding the smallest errors. Overall, substantial progress was observed over the study period.
