Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessing Refugee Preferences for SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) Solutions in Irbid Camp and Sakhra Region: Cultivated Roofs and Refrigerators as Food Banks Interventions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessing Refugee Preferences for SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) Solutions in Irbid Camp and Sakhra Region: Cultivated Roofs and Refrigerators as Food Banks Interventions
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessing Refugee Preferences for SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) Solutions in Irbid Camp and Sakhra Region: Cultivated Roofs and Refrigerators as Food Banks Interventions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Assessing Refugee Preferences for SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) Solutions in Irbid Camp and Sakhra Region: Cultivated Roofs and Refrigerators as Food Banks Interventions
2023
Overview
Addressing hunger, particularly within impoverished communities in Jordan and globally, demands innovative, practical solutions. The research focused on refugee populations and their preferences for interventions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2: Zero Hunger remains limited. This study explores the preferences of refugees in the Irbid Camp and Sakhra region, Jordan, for two potential interventions—cultivated roofs (CRs) and refrigerators as food banks (RaFB). Surveys conducted among 402 households serve to determine refugee preferences in hunger reduction, the influence of demographic attributes on these choices, and the feasibility of each proposed intervention. Chi-square tests were utilized to establish correlations between refugee intervention preferences and demographic variables, such as age, gender, education level, and family size. The results reveal a strong preference (90%) for RaFB over CRs (10%). While no significant demographic influence was identified on the acceptance of CRs, a strong correlation was discovered between the education level and the acceptance of the RaFB intervention. RaFB was predominantly favored due to its lower implementation costs, reduced effort, lower risk, cultural compatibility, and demonstrated success in similar contexts. Conversely, highly educated refugees were more likely to reject RaFB, indicating potential influences from diverse cultural perspectives or access to alternate solutions. This study provides valuable insight into the potential advantages and challenges of implementing CRs and RaFB projects. It further underscores the need for policymakers to consider demographic factors and cultural nuances in future intervention designs to achieve SDG 2 more effectively.
