MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model
Journal Article

Application of a minimally invasive full‐thickness autologous microcolumn skin harvesting device for donor site tissue collection and augmenting wound healing in a porcine wound model

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Using a 6‐week porcine full‐thickness excisional wound grafting model, we evaluated the Autologous Regeneration of Tissue (ART®) System, a novel skin harvesting device designed to collect autologous full‐thickness autologous microcolumns (FTAM) at 0.5 mm in diameter. The donor skin sites were harvested using the ART® System and compared to split‐thickness skin grafts (STSGs). Recipient sites were divided into three treatment groups: FTAM, STSG and Untreated control. Comparing the FTAM donor sites to the STSG donor sites, we observed significantly faster re‐epithelization by Day 4 (p < 0.05), earlier adnexal structures and rete ridge formation by Week 3, and increased collagen and elastin content by Week 6. We also observed an increased rate of healing at the FTAM donor site whilst limiting donor site morbidity compared to traditional STSG donor sites. Time to recipient site closure was 2.4 weeks for STSG treated, 3.3 weeks for FTAM treated and 4.1 weeks for the Untreated control (p < 0.05). The STSG and FTAM recipient sites reached complete re‐epithelialization by Weeks 4 and 5, respectively which was significantly faster compared to the Untreated control. However, the FTAM recipient site received only 10% of the donor site tissue relative to the recipient site area and the amount of donor site tissue grafted on the STSG recipient sites was 5× more than the FTAM recipient sites. Additionally, the FTAMs harvested by the ART® System augmented recipient wound site healing as a result of ‘epithelial island’ expansion in contrast to Untreated control sites that closed primarily by contracture.