Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
If you could see what we see, would it bother you?
by
Takase-Sanchez, Michelle M.
, Heit, Michael H.
, Hamner, Jennifer J.
, Hale, Douglass S.
, Khoder, Waseem
, Kassis, Nadine C.
in
Aged
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological - psychology
/ Female
/ Gynecology
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Article
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - diagnosis
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
/ Prospective Studies
/ Random Allocation
/ Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - psychology
/ Urology
/ Vagina - diagnostic imaging
/ Vagina - surgery
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
If you could see what we see, would it bother you?
by
Takase-Sanchez, Michelle M.
, Heit, Michael H.
, Hamner, Jennifer J.
, Hale, Douglass S.
, Khoder, Waseem
, Kassis, Nadine C.
in
Aged
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological - psychology
/ Female
/ Gynecology
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Article
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - diagnosis
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
/ Prospective Studies
/ Random Allocation
/ Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - psychology
/ Urology
/ Vagina - diagnostic imaging
/ Vagina - surgery
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
If you could see what we see, would it bother you?
by
Takase-Sanchez, Michelle M.
, Heit, Michael H.
, Hamner, Jennifer J.
, Hale, Douglass S.
, Khoder, Waseem
, Kassis, Nadine C.
in
Aged
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological - psychology
/ Female
/ Gynecology
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Article
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - diagnosis
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
/ Prospective Studies
/ Random Allocation
/ Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - psychology
/ Urology
/ Vagina - diagnostic imaging
/ Vagina - surgery
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
If you could see what we see, would it bother you?
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective
The purpose of our study was to determine whether the anatomic threshold for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) diagnosis and surgical success remains valid when the patient sees what we see on exam.
Methods
Two hundred participants were assigned, by computer-generated block randomization, to see one of four videos. Each video contained the same six clips representative of various degrees of anterior vaginal wall support. Participants were asked questions immediately after each clip. They were asked: “In your opinion, does this patient have a bulge or something falling out that she can see or feel in the vaginal area?” Similarly, they were asked to give their opinion on surgical outcome on a 4-point Likert scale.
Results
The proportion of participants who identified the presence of a vaginal bulge increased substantially at the level of early stage 2 prolapse (1 cm above the hymen), with 67 % answering yes to the question regarding bulge. The proportion of participants who felt that surgical outcome was less desirable also increased substantially at early stage 2 prolapse (1 cm above the hymen), with 52 % describing that outcome as “not at all” or “somewhat” successful.
Conclusion
Early stage 2 POP (1 cm above the hymen) is the anatomic threshold at which women identify both a vaginal bulge and a less desirable surgical outcome when they see what we see on examination.
Publisher
Springer London,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological - psychology
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - diagnosis
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - psychology
/ Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
/ Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - psychology
/ Urology
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.