Journal Article

Imaging of sudden unexpected death in infancy: a comprehensive nationwide French survey

Grandmougin, Aurélie, Leiber, Louis-Marie, Prodhomme, Olivier, Aikem, Nadia, Dumas, Victor, Dancrade, Sandrine, Tisseron, Barbara, Margerin, Mathilde, Carsin-Vu, Aline, Lenoir, Marion, Alison, Marianne, Muanza, Blandine, Ducloyer, Mathilde, Delbreil, Alexia, Delmas, Jean, Russel-Robillard, Anne-Sophie, Casson-Masselin, Mathilde, Nugues, Frédérique, Boutry, Nathalie, Rega, Adelaïde, Farges, Celine, Vial, Julie, Carballeira Alvarez, Ana, Chateil, Jean-François, Bruneau, Bertrand, Proisy, Maïa, Mergy-Laurent, Martine, Loisel, Didier, Englender, Mariana, Delval, Antoine, Sebastià Sancho, Consuelo, Pupin, Alexandre, Hassani, Adnan, Morel, Baptiste, Desbordes de Cepoy, Patrick, Garcier, Jean-Marc, Delorme, Benoit, Boyer, Corinne, Cabaret, Blandine, Dubourg, Morgane, Sellier, Nicolas, Tasu, Jean Pierre, Lorthois-Ninou, Sylvie

2024

Overview

Rationale and objectivesIntroduction of post-mortem imaging has helped improve sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) management in Europe. French guidelines were issued in 2007 to homogenise SUDI investigations including imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate current imaging management of SUDI in France.Material and methodsBetween January 2022 and July 2022, all 35 SUDI French referral centres were invited to answer an e-mailed online survey including 29 questions divided into four different sections covering imaging practices for SUDI including radiology department organisation, imaging modalities performed, methods of reading, and current training resources. Partial responses were secondarily completed by a personal call to the SUDI imaging consultant. The current implementation of the 2007 recommendations was compared with a previous evaluation from 2015 and with current North American practices.ResultsThe participation rate of centres performing SUDI imaging was 100% (35/35). Imaging was systematically performed in 94.3% (33/35) of the centres: 74.3% (26/35) using radiography; 5.7% (2/35) using ultrasound; 94.3% (33/35) using computed tomography (CT), including 89% (31/35) whole-body CT and 5.7% (2/35) brain CT; and 20% (7/35) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two centres (5.7%, 2/35) did not systematically perform brain imaging. One (2.9%, 1/35) used ultrasound-guided biopsy. In comparison with 2015, rates of brain imaging increased by 25.4% (P=0.008). There was no significant difference in the number of forensic MRIs performed between France and North America (P=0.663).ConclusionDespite improvements since 2015, full compliance with French guidelines for SUDI investigations remains incomplete. The use of imaging, particularly CT and brain imaging, has increased. Further efforts are needed to standardise imaging practices for optimal SUDI investigations.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Autopsy / Biopsy / Brain / Computed tomography / Guidelines / Magnetic resonance imaging / Medical imaging / Neuroimaging / Radiography / SIDS / Sudden infant death syndrome / Surveys / Ultrasonic imaging / Ultrasound