Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Toward neural-network-based large eddy simulation: application to turbulent channel flow
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Toward neural-network-based large eddy simulation: application to turbulent channel flow
Do you wish to request the book?
Toward neural-network-based large eddy simulation: application to turbulent channel flow
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Toward neural-network-based large eddy simulation: application to turbulent channel flow
2021
Overview
A fully connected neural network (NN) is used to develop a subgrid-scale (SGS) model mapping the relation between the SGS stresses and filtered flow variables in a turbulent channel flow at $Re_\\tau = 178$. A priori and a posteriori tests are performed to investigate its prediction performance. In a priori test, an NN-based SGS model with the input filtered strain rate or velocity gradient tensor at multiple points provides highest correlation coefficients between the predicted and true SGS stresses, and reasonably predicts the backscatter. However, this model provides unstable solution in a posteriori test, unless a special treatment such as backscatter clipping is used. On the other hand, an NN-based SGS model with the input filtered strain rate tensor at single point shows an excellent prediction capability for the mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress in a posteriori test, although it gives low correlation coefficients between the true and predicted SGS stresses in a priori test. This NN-based SGS model trained at $Re_\\tau = 178$ is applied to a turbulent channel flow at $Re_\\tau = 723$ using the same grid resolution in wall units, providing fairly good agreements of the solutions with the filtered direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. When the grid resolution in wall units is different from that of trained data, this NN-based SGS model does not perform well. This is overcome by training an NN with the datasets having two filters whose sizes are bigger and smaller than the grid size in large eddy simulation (LES). Finally, the limitations of NN-based LES to complex flow are discussed.
