MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction
Journal Article

Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objectives After tooth extraction, marked resorption occurs in extraction socket walls, leading to functional and esthetic problems in that area. One of the methods introduced to reduce this resorption is the use of platelet derivatives. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on the changes following tooth extraction. Materials and methods The participants were 24 patients who needed to replace at least one single-rooted tooth with an implant. They were randomly divided into test and control groups. After the tooth extraction, the sockets in the test group received LPRF clots, while in the control group, the sockets were left free of any interventions. CBCT scans were obtained from the extraction site both immediately after the tooth extraction and 8 weeks later. The histologic biopsy was also obtained while the implant site was being prepared 8 weeks after the extraction. Results The average vertical bone loss in the buccal crest was not significantly different between the two groups (1.67 ± 1.67 in the test group and 2.3 ± 1.36 in the control group; mean difference =  − 0.36, 95% CI: − 1.65–0.93, p -value = 0.57). Nor was the difference in resorption of the palatal wall (mean difference =  − 0.19, 95% CI: − 1.51.12, p -value = 0.76). The mean ridge width resorption in 25% of the coronal aspect of sockets was also measured in the test (1.30 ± 0.66) and control group (0.58 ± 0.95) (mean difference = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.03–1.42, p -value = 0.04). The new bone formation in histologic view was not statistically different between groups ( p -value = 0.15). Conclusion The LPRF neither reduces the rate of ridge resorption in vertical or horizontal dimensions of extraction sockets nor induces more new bone formation. Clinical relevance This study helps dentists choose the appropriate material for ridge preservation.