Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Theta Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Orofacial Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Theta Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Orofacial Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Do you wish to request the book?
Theta Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Orofacial Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Theta Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Orofacial Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
2017
Overview
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a modified form of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with promising effect in chronic pain. The aim of our double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, randomized study was to assess an efficacy of intermittent TBS (iTBS) in the treatment of patients with chronic orofacial pain. Nineteen patients (twelve females) with chronic orofacial pain were prospectively included and randomly assigned to single session of an active (iTBS) or sham (intermediate TBS; imTBS) stimulation delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to painful side. The primary outcome was pain relief assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) after stimulation and at the end of two-week follow- up. The secondary outcomes were changes in the quantitative sensory testing (QST). QST set the threshold for thermal and tactile (touch) sensation in the affected facial area. Intermittent TBS, compared with the sham, showed significant improvement in VAS after stimulation, but not at the end of two-week follow-up. Regarding the secondary outcomes (QST), we failed to find any significant difference between iTBS and sham. Our findings demonstrate that iTBS of M1 transiently provides transient and modest subjective pain relief in chronic orofacial pain.
Publisher
Institute of Physiology
