Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Microstructural and Mechanical Property Variations in 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Under High-Density Processing Conditions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Microstructural and Mechanical Property Variations in 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Under High-Density Processing Conditions
Do you wish to request the book?
Microstructural and Mechanical Property Variations in 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Under High-Density Processing Conditions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Microstructural and Mechanical Property Variations in 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Under High-Density Processing Conditions
2025
Overview
It has become a trend to precisely control the additive manufacturing process parameters within the high-density process window to obtain high-performance metal parts. However, there are few reports on this topic currently, leaving this research without sufficient references. This study took 316L austenitic stainless steel as a case study. In total, 36 groups of specimens were manufactured by Laser powder bed melting (LPBF), and then, two highly dense specimens were selected to study the variation in their microstructure and properties. The densities of the selected specimens, S1 (VED = 81 J/mm3) and S2 (VED = 156.3 J/mm3), are 99.68% and 99.99%, respectively. The results indicated that, compared with the S1 specimen, the S2 specimen significantly decreased in terms of yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and elongation (EL), which are 7.28%, 6.34%, and 19.15%, respectively. The differences in mechanical properties were primarily attributed to differences in their microstructures. Further, compared with the S1 specimen, the fitted ellipse aspect ratio and average grain size of the S2 specimen increased by 79.88% and 53.45%, respectively, and the kernel average misorientation (KAM) value and geometric necessary dislocation (GND) density increased by 36.00% and 58.43%, respectively. Furthermore, the S1 specimen exhibited a strong texture in the //Z direction, whereas no obvious texture was observed in the S2 specimen. Obviously, the reason why precise regulation within the dense parameter range can achieve better performance is that the microstructure and mechanical properties of the specimens prepared within the dense range are different. More importantly, this study provides a feasible framework for optimizing alloys with broad and dense parameter ranges, demonstrating the potential to achieve high-performance components through precise parameter control. Furthermore, the results reveal that even within a wide range of high-density forming parameters, significant variations in microstructure and mechanical properties can arise depending on the selected parameter combinations. These findings underscore the critical importance of meticulous process parameter optimization and microstructural regulation in tailoring material properties.
