Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol
by
Jimenez, Jose L.
, Turner, Jay R.
, Kim, Patrick S.
, Silvern, Rachel F.
, Campuzano-Jost, Pedro
, Jacob, Daniel J.
, Marais, Eloise A.
in
Acidity
/ Aerosols
/ Airborne particulates
/ Ammonia
/ Ammonia emissions
/ Ammonium
/ Ammonium compounds
/ Ammonium sulfate
/ Chemical transport
/ Deposition
/ Emissions
/ Emissions control
/ Equilibrium
/ Gases
/ Humidity
/ Hygroscopicity
/ Laboratories
/ Mass transfer
/ Ratios
/ Secondary aerosols
/ Stoichiometry
/ Sulfate aerosols
/ Sulfate particles
/ Sulfates
/ Sulfur dioxide
/ Thermodynamic models
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uptake
/ Vapor phases
/ Wet deposition
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol
by
Jimenez, Jose L.
, Turner, Jay R.
, Kim, Patrick S.
, Silvern, Rachel F.
, Campuzano-Jost, Pedro
, Jacob, Daniel J.
, Marais, Eloise A.
in
Acidity
/ Aerosols
/ Airborne particulates
/ Ammonia
/ Ammonia emissions
/ Ammonium
/ Ammonium compounds
/ Ammonium sulfate
/ Chemical transport
/ Deposition
/ Emissions
/ Emissions control
/ Equilibrium
/ Gases
/ Humidity
/ Hygroscopicity
/ Laboratories
/ Mass transfer
/ Ratios
/ Secondary aerosols
/ Stoichiometry
/ Sulfate aerosols
/ Sulfate particles
/ Sulfates
/ Sulfur dioxide
/ Thermodynamic models
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uptake
/ Vapor phases
/ Wet deposition
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol
by
Jimenez, Jose L.
, Turner, Jay R.
, Kim, Patrick S.
, Silvern, Rachel F.
, Campuzano-Jost, Pedro
, Jacob, Daniel J.
, Marais, Eloise A.
in
Acidity
/ Aerosols
/ Airborne particulates
/ Ammonia
/ Ammonia emissions
/ Ammonium
/ Ammonium compounds
/ Ammonium sulfate
/ Chemical transport
/ Deposition
/ Emissions
/ Emissions control
/ Equilibrium
/ Gases
/ Humidity
/ Hygroscopicity
/ Laboratories
/ Mass transfer
/ Ratios
/ Secondary aerosols
/ Stoichiometry
/ Sulfate aerosols
/ Sulfate particles
/ Sulfates
/ Sulfur dioxide
/ Thermodynamic models
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uptake
/ Vapor phases
/ Wet deposition
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol
Journal Article
Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Thermodynamic models predict that sulfate aerosol (S(VI) ≡ H2SO4(aq) + HSO4−+ SO42−) should take up available ammonia (NH3) quantitatively as ammonium (NH4+) until the ammonium sulfate stoichiometry (NH4)2SO4 is close to being reached. This uptake of ammonia has important implications for aerosol mass, hygroscopicity, and acidity. When ammonia is in excess, the ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratio R = [NH4+] ∕ [S(VI)] should approach 2, with excess ammonia remaining in the gas phase. When ammonia is in deficit, it should be fully taken up by the aerosol as ammonium and no significant ammonia should remain in the gas phase. Here we report that sulfate aerosol in the eastern US in summer has a low ammonium–sulfate ratio despite excess ammonia, and we show that this is at odds with thermodynamic models. The ammonium–sulfate ratio averages only 1.04 ± 0.21 mol mol−1 in the Southeast, even though ammonia is in large excess, as shown by the ammonium–sulfate ratio in wet deposition and by the presence of gas-phase ammonia. It further appears that the ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratio is insensitive to the supply of ammonia, remaining low even as the wet deposition ratio exceeds 6 mol mol−1. While the ammonium–sulfate ratio in wet deposition has increased by 5.8 % yr−1 from 2003 to 2013 in the Southeast, consistent with SO2 emission controls, the ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratio decreased by 1.4–3.0 % yr−1. Thus, the aerosol is becoming more acidic even as SO2 emissions decrease and ammonia emissions stay constant; this is incompatible with simple sulfate–ammonium thermodynamics. A tentative explanation is that sulfate particles are increasingly coated by organic material, retarding the uptake of ammonia. Indeed, the ratio of organic aerosol (OA) to sulfate in the Southeast increased from 1.1 to 2.4 g g−1 over the 2003–2013 period as sulfate decreased. We implement a simple kinetic mass transfer limitation for ammonia uptake to sulfate aerosols in the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model and find that we can reproduce both the observed ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios and the concurrent presence of gas-phase ammonia. If sulfate aerosol becomes more acidic as OA ∕ sulfate ratios increase, then controlling SO2 emissions to decrease sulfate aerosol will not have the co-benefit of suppressing acid-catalyzed secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.