Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Method for Choosing the Spatial and Temporal Approximations for the LES Approach
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Method for Choosing the Spatial and Temporal Approximations for the LES Approach
Do you wish to request the book?
A Method for Choosing the Spatial and Temporal Approximations for the LES Approach
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Method for Choosing the Spatial and Temporal Approximations for the LES Approach
2022
Overview
Analysis and optimization of the hybrid upwind-central numerical methods for modern versions of large eddy simulations (LESs) are presented herein. Optimization was performed based on examination of the characteristics of the spatial and temporal finite-volume approximations of the convective terms of filtered Navier–Stokes equations. A method for selecting level of subgrid viscosity that corresponds to the chosen numerical scheme and makes it possible to obtain an extended inertial interval of the energy spectrum is proposed. A series of LESs of homogeneous isotropic turbulence decay were carried out, and the optimal values of the subgrid model constants included in the hybrid shear stress transport delay detached eddy simulation (SST-DDES) method were determined. A procedure for generating a consistent initial field of subgrid parameters for these simulations is described. The three-stage explicit Runge–Kutta method was demonstrated to be sufficient for stable time integration, while the popular explicit midpoint method was not. The slope of the energy spectrum was shown to be almost independent of the central-difference scheme order and of the mesh spacing when the correct numerical method was applied. Numerical viscosity was found to become much greater than subgrid viscosity when the upwind scheme contributed about 10% or more to the convective flux approximation.
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.