Journal Article

Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Longo, Umile Giuseppe, De Salvatore, Sergio, Berton, Alessandra, Piergentili, Ilaria, Denaro, Vincenzo, Calabrese, Giovanni, Warren, Russell F., Roberti, Federica, Gulotta, Lawrence V.

2022

Overview

There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes.

• Publisher: MDPI AG,MDPI
• Subject: Bias / Biomechanics / Clinical medicine / Cohort analysis / Joint replacement surgery / Patients / Prostheses / Range of motion / Shoulder / Systematic review