Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Hydrologic niches explain species coexistence and abundance in a shrub–steppe system
by
Foley, Karen M.
, Kulmatiski, Andrew
, Adler, Peter B.
in
Absorptivity
/ Abundance
/ biomass
/ Coexistence
/ Correlation
/ Distribution
/ Dominant species
/ ecohydrology
/ ecosystems
/ Geographical distribution
/ Growing season
/ Hydrology
/ hydrus
/ isotope
/ landscapes
/ Moisture content
/ Niche overlap
/ Niches
/ Plant growth
/ Plant roots
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ root
/ Rooting
/ Roots
/ Soil
/ soil resource
/ soil water
/ Soil water movement
/ Soils
/ spatial distribution
/ species abundance
/ Steppes
/ tracer
/ Tracers
/ two‐layer hypothesis
/ Uptake
/ Vertical distribution
/ Water
/ Water depth
/ Water flow
/ Water uptake
/ water use
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Hydrologic niches explain species coexistence and abundance in a shrub–steppe system
by
Foley, Karen M.
, Kulmatiski, Andrew
, Adler, Peter B.
in
Absorptivity
/ Abundance
/ biomass
/ Coexistence
/ Correlation
/ Distribution
/ Dominant species
/ ecohydrology
/ ecosystems
/ Geographical distribution
/ Growing season
/ Hydrology
/ hydrus
/ isotope
/ landscapes
/ Moisture content
/ Niche overlap
/ Niches
/ Plant growth
/ Plant roots
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ root
/ Rooting
/ Roots
/ Soil
/ soil resource
/ soil water
/ Soil water movement
/ Soils
/ spatial distribution
/ species abundance
/ Steppes
/ tracer
/ Tracers
/ two‐layer hypothesis
/ Uptake
/ Vertical distribution
/ Water
/ Water depth
/ Water flow
/ Water uptake
/ water use
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Hydrologic niches explain species coexistence and abundance in a shrub–steppe system
by
Foley, Karen M.
, Kulmatiski, Andrew
, Adler, Peter B.
in
Absorptivity
/ Abundance
/ biomass
/ Coexistence
/ Correlation
/ Distribution
/ Dominant species
/ ecohydrology
/ ecosystems
/ Geographical distribution
/ Growing season
/ Hydrology
/ hydrus
/ isotope
/ landscapes
/ Moisture content
/ Niche overlap
/ Niches
/ Plant growth
/ Plant roots
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ root
/ Rooting
/ Roots
/ Soil
/ soil resource
/ soil water
/ Soil water movement
/ Soils
/ spatial distribution
/ species abundance
/ Steppes
/ tracer
/ Tracers
/ two‐layer hypothesis
/ Uptake
/ Vertical distribution
/ Water
/ Water depth
/ Water flow
/ Water uptake
/ water use
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Hydrologic niches explain species coexistence and abundance in a shrub–steppe system
Journal Article
Hydrologic niches explain species coexistence and abundance in a shrub–steppe system
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Differences in vertical root distributions are often assumed to create resource uptake trade‐offs that determine plant growth and coexistence. Yet, most plant roots are in shallow soils, and data linking root distributions with resource uptake and plant abundances remain elusive. Here we used a tracer experiment to describe the vertical distribution of absorptive roots of dominant species in a shrub–steppe ecosystem. To describe how these different rooting distributions affected water uptake in wet and dry soils across a growing season, we used a soil water movement model. Root traits were then correlated with plant landscape abundances. Deeper root distributions extracted more soil water, had larger unique hydrological niches and were more abundant on the landscape. Though most (>50%) root biomass and tracer uptake occurred in shallow soils (0–32 cm), the depth of 50% of tracer uptake varied from 11 to 32 cm across species and species with deeper rooting distributions were more abundant on the landscape (R2 = .95). The water flow model revealed that deeper rooting distributions should extract more soil water (i.e. a range of 60–113 mm of soil water) because shallow roots were often in dry soils. These potential water uptake values were tightly correlated with species’ abundances on the landscape (R2 = .90). Finally, each species’ rooting distribution demonstrated a depth and time at which it could extract more soil water than any other rooting distribution, and the size of these unique hydrological niches indices was also well correlated with species’ abundances (R2 = .89). Synthesis. Our results demonstrate not only a correlation between root distributions and species abundance, but also the mechanism through which differences in rooting distributions can determine resource uptake and niche partitioning, even when most roots are found in shallow soils. Vertical patterns of tracer uptake (a) were used in a water flow model to describe the depth, timing and amount of water uptake by species (b). Water uptake was highly correlated with species abundance on the landscape (c).
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.