Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study
by
Sayed, Amr H
, Dahab, Hisham M
, Ali, Mai A
, Behairy, Gad M
, Abdelaal, Amr A
, Khalaf, Dina Z
, Elayashy Mohamed
, Mohamed, Mostafa A
, Elfouly, Amr H
, Obaya, Gihan M
, Mukhtar, Ahmed M
, Eladawy, Akram A
in
Confidence intervals
/ Hemodynamics
/ Liver
/ Liver transplants
/ Observational studies
/ Optimization
/ Patients
/ Reliability analysis
/ Resuscitation
/ Transplantation
/ Velocimetry
/ Velocity measurement
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study
by
Sayed, Amr H
, Dahab, Hisham M
, Ali, Mai A
, Behairy, Gad M
, Abdelaal, Amr A
, Khalaf, Dina Z
, Elayashy Mohamed
, Mohamed, Mostafa A
, Elfouly, Amr H
, Obaya, Gihan M
, Mukhtar, Ahmed M
, Eladawy, Akram A
in
Confidence intervals
/ Hemodynamics
/ Liver
/ Liver transplants
/ Observational studies
/ Optimization
/ Patients
/ Reliability analysis
/ Resuscitation
/ Transplantation
/ Velocimetry
/ Velocity measurement
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study
by
Sayed, Amr H
, Dahab, Hisham M
, Ali, Mai A
, Behairy, Gad M
, Abdelaal, Amr A
, Khalaf, Dina Z
, Elayashy Mohamed
, Mohamed, Mostafa A
, Elfouly, Amr H
, Obaya, Gihan M
, Mukhtar, Ahmed M
, Eladawy, Akram A
in
Confidence intervals
/ Hemodynamics
/ Liver
/ Liver transplants
/ Observational studies
/ Optimization
/ Patients
/ Reliability analysis
/ Resuscitation
/ Transplantation
/ Velocimetry
/ Velocity measurement
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study
Journal Article
Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Major hemodynamic changes are frequently noted during liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated the performance of electrical velocimetry (EV) as compared to that of TEE in SV optimization during liver transplantation. This was an observational study in 32 patients undergoing LT. We compared SV values measured simultaneously by EV (SVEV) and TEE (SVTEE) at baseline 30 min after induction, at the end of dissection phase, 30 min after anhepatic phase, 30 min after reperfusion. We also evaluated the reliability of EV to track changes In SV before and after 49 fluid challenges. Finally, the SV variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were tested as predictors for volume responsiveness, defined as an increase in SV ≥ 10% after 250 ml of colloid. For 112 paired SV data, the overall correlation was 0.76 and bias (limits of agreement) 0.3 (− 29 to 29) ml percentage error 62%. The EV was able to track changes in SV with a concordance rate of 97%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 93% to detect a positive fluid challenge. The AUC values (with 95% confidence intervals) for SVV and PPV were 0.68 (0.52–0.83) and 0.72 (0.57–0.86), respectively, indicating low predictive capacity in these setting. The absolute values of SV derived from EV did not agree with SV derived from TEE. However, EV was able to track the direction of changes in SV during hemodynamic management of patients undergoing liver transplantation.Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228329 prospectively Registered on 13-July-2017.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.