Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
by
Ștețiu, Maria Antonia
, Popescu, Mircea
, Drăguș, Andi Ciprian
, Vorovenci, Andrei
, Petri, Diana-Cristina
, Malița, Mădălina Adriana
, Burlibașa, Andrei
, Costea, Radu Cătălin
, Burlibașa, Liliana
, Costea, Raluca Mariana
, Burlibașa, Mihai
, Ștețiu, Andreea Angela
, Perieanu, Viorel Stefan
in
3-D printers
/ Bias
/ CAD
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative studies
/ Computer aided design
/ Cost analysis
/ Cost control
/ Decision making
/ Dentistry
/ Dentures
/ Efficiency
/ Manufacturing
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Prosthodontics
/ Systematic review
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
by
Ștețiu, Maria Antonia
, Popescu, Mircea
, Drăguș, Andi Ciprian
, Vorovenci, Andrei
, Petri, Diana-Cristina
, Malița, Mădălina Adriana
, Burlibașa, Andrei
, Costea, Radu Cătălin
, Burlibașa, Liliana
, Costea, Raluca Mariana
, Burlibașa, Mihai
, Ștețiu, Andreea Angela
, Perieanu, Viorel Stefan
in
3-D printers
/ Bias
/ CAD
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative studies
/ Computer aided design
/ Cost analysis
/ Cost control
/ Decision making
/ Dentistry
/ Dentures
/ Efficiency
/ Manufacturing
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Prosthodontics
/ Systematic review
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
by
Ștețiu, Maria Antonia
, Popescu, Mircea
, Drăguș, Andi Ciprian
, Vorovenci, Andrei
, Petri, Diana-Cristina
, Malița, Mădălina Adriana
, Burlibașa, Andrei
, Costea, Radu Cătălin
, Burlibașa, Liliana
, Costea, Raluca Mariana
, Burlibașa, Mihai
, Ștețiu, Andreea Angela
, Perieanu, Viorel Stefan
in
3-D printers
/ Bias
/ CAD
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative studies
/ Computer aided design
/ Cost analysis
/ Cost control
/ Decision making
/ Dentistry
/ Dentures
/ Efficiency
/ Manufacturing
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Prosthodontics
/ Systematic review
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
Journal Article
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost, production time, clinical performance, and patient satisfaction of 3D printing workflows in prosthodontics compared to conventional and subtractive methods. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025 that directly compared digital additive workflows with analogue or subtractive workflows. Studies were eligible if they included prosthodontic treatments such as dentures, crowns, or implant-supported prostheses and reported at least one relevant outcome. The primary outcomes were cost, time efficiency, clinical accuracy (e.g., marginal adaptation, fit), and patient satisfaction. Included studies were methodologically evaluated using MINORS scale and the risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 3D printing workflows demonstrated reduced production time and cost in comparison to conventional or subtractive methods. Clinical outcomes were generally comparable or superior, particularly regarding adaptation and fit. Patient satisfaction was favourable in most studies, although reporting varied. Long-term follow-up was limited, which constrains the interpretation of sustained clinical performance. Conclusions: These findings suggest that 3D printing can serve as an efficient and cost-effective alternative in prosthodontic fabrication, with clinical results comparable to those already established. Further research is needed to assess long-term clinical performance and cost-effectiveness in various clinical scenarios.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.