Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Induced Acute Liver Failure and Injury
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Induced Acute Liver Failure and Injury
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Induced Acute Liver Failure and Injury
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Induced Acute Liver Failure and Injury
2016
Overview
The increasing use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) has been associated with a rising incidence of CAM-induced drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The aim of this study was to examine the clinical features and outcomes among patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute liver injury (ALI) enrolled in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group database, comparing CAM-induced with prescription medicine (PM)-induced DILI.
A total of 2,626 hospitalized patients with ALF/ALI of any etiology were prospectively enrolled between 1998 and 2015 from 32 academic transplant centers. Only those with CAM or PM-induced ALI/ALF were selected for analysis.
A total of 253 (9.6%) subjects were found to have idiosyncratic DILI, of which 41 (16.3%) were from CAM and 210 (83.7%) were due to PM. The fraction of DILI-ALF/ALI cases due to CAM increased from 1998-2007 to 2007-2015 (12.4 vs. 21.1%, P=0.047). There was no difference in the type of liver injury-hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed-between groups as determined by R score (P=0.26). PM-induced DILI showed higher serum alkaline phosphatase levels compared with the CAM group (median IU/L, 171 vs. 125, P=0.003). The CAM population had fewer comorbid conditions (1.0 vs. 2.0, P<0.005), higher transplantation rates (56 vs. 32%, P<0.005), and a lower ALF-specific 21-day transplant-free survival (17 vs. 34%, P=0.044).
CAM-induced DILI is at least as severe in presentation as that observed due to PM with higher rates of transplantation and lower transplant-free survival in those who progress to ALF. This study highlights the increasing incidence of CAM-induced liver injury and emphasizes the importance of early referral and evaluation for liver transplantation when CAM-induced liver injury is suspected.
Subject
/ Alkaline Phosphatase - blood
/ Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - blood
/ Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - diagnosis
/ Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - etiology
/ Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - therapy
/ Complementary Therapies - adverse effects
/ Complementary Therapies - methods
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Liver Failure, Acute - blood
/ Liver Failure, Acute - diagnosis
/ Liver Failure, Acute - etiology
/ Liver Failure, Acute - therapy
/ Liver Function Tests - methods
/ Liver Transplantation - methods
/ Liver Transplantation - statistics & numerical data
/ Male
