Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Improving the Precision of NDVI Estimates in Upland Cotton Field Trials
by
Hugie, K.L.
, Campbell, B.T.
, Bauer, P.J.
, Barnes, E.M.
, Stone, K.C.
, Jones, D.C.
in
Agricultural production
/ canopy
/ Cotton
/ Data collection
/ experimental design
/ field experimentation
/ genotype
/ Genotype & phenotype
/ Genotypes
/ Global positioning systems
/ Gossypium hirsutum
/ GPS
/ lint yield
/ normalized difference vegetation index
/ phenotype
/ Phenotyping
/ Reflectance
/ Seeds
/ Sensors
/ Soil fertility
/ South Carolina
/ Spatial analysis
/ Vegetation
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Improving the Precision of NDVI Estimates in Upland Cotton Field Trials
by
Hugie, K.L.
, Campbell, B.T.
, Bauer, P.J.
, Barnes, E.M.
, Stone, K.C.
, Jones, D.C.
in
Agricultural production
/ canopy
/ Cotton
/ Data collection
/ experimental design
/ field experimentation
/ genotype
/ Genotype & phenotype
/ Genotypes
/ Global positioning systems
/ Gossypium hirsutum
/ GPS
/ lint yield
/ normalized difference vegetation index
/ phenotype
/ Phenotyping
/ Reflectance
/ Seeds
/ Sensors
/ Soil fertility
/ South Carolina
/ Spatial analysis
/ Vegetation
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Improving the Precision of NDVI Estimates in Upland Cotton Field Trials
by
Hugie, K.L.
, Campbell, B.T.
, Bauer, P.J.
, Barnes, E.M.
, Stone, K.C.
, Jones, D.C.
in
Agricultural production
/ canopy
/ Cotton
/ Data collection
/ experimental design
/ field experimentation
/ genotype
/ Genotype & phenotype
/ Genotypes
/ Global positioning systems
/ Gossypium hirsutum
/ GPS
/ lint yield
/ normalized difference vegetation index
/ phenotype
/ Phenotyping
/ Reflectance
/ Seeds
/ Sensors
/ Soil fertility
/ South Carolina
/ Spatial analysis
/ Vegetation
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Improving the Precision of NDVI Estimates in Upland Cotton Field Trials
Journal Article
Improving the Precision of NDVI Estimates in Upland Cotton Field Trials
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Core Ideas Estimates of NDVI in upland cotton were influenced by field heterogeneity. Row–column design and spatial analysis improved the precision of NDVI estimates. Extensive rank changes in genotype mean estimates were observed across models. Controlling for experimental error attributable to field heterogeneity is important in high‐throughput phenotyping studies that enable large numbers of genotypes to be evaluated across time and space. In the current study, we compared the efficacy of different experimental designs and spatial models in the analysis of canopy spectral reflectance data collected on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Canopy spectral reflectance, as measured by normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), was measured at first bloom on three upland cotton performance trials conducted in Florence, SC, during 2014 and 2015. The relative efficiency and estimates of genotype effects were compared among randomized complete block, an α‐lattice incomplete block, row–column incomplete block, nearest neighbor adjusted, and spatially correlated error models. The row–column model provided the greatest improvement in the precision of genotype effect estimates compared with the randomized complete block model. Genotype rankings based on NDVI varied substantially between the randomized complete block and alternative models, particularly at 5 and 10% selection intensities. These results suggest that the use of more complex experimental designs and spatial analyses should be routinely considered to minimize experimental error due to field heterogeneity and improve the precision and reliability of traits measured using high‐throughput phenotyping systems. These findings also indicate that further research into the effects of field heterogeneity on the relationship between NDVI and lint yield in upland cotton is warranted.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.