Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
2020
Overview
BackgroundThe repetitive and forceful motions used by operating surgeons increase the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders. Most ergonomists consider the surgical environment to be incredibly harsh for its workers. Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) in particular has a number of physical and mental challenges associated with it, and while Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (RALS) provides several features that improve upon TLS, some surgeons have still reported musculoskeletal symptoms they attribute to RALS. In this paper, we endeavored to systematically review muscle activation for both TLS and RALS, to compare the modalities and present the results as a meta-analysis.MethodsA literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases in November 2018 with the following inclusion criteria: full text was available in English, the paper contained original data, EMG was one of the primary measurement techniques, and the paper included EMG data for both TLS and RALS. Results from studies were compared using standardized mean difference analysis.ResultsA total of 379 papers were found, and through screening ten were selected for inclusion. Sample populations ranged from 1 to 31 surgeons, and a variety of study designs and metrics were used between studies. The biceps were the only muscle group that consistently and significantly demonstrated lower muscle activation for RALS for all included studies.ConclusionsThe results may support the belief that RALS is ergonomically superior to TLS, shown through generally lower muscle activation scores. However, these results must be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity between the studies and multiple potential sources for bias within studies. This analysis would be strengthened with a higher number of homogenous, high-quality studies examining larger sample sizes.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
