Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Role of Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging in Intensive Care Treatment of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Role of Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging in Intensive Care Treatment of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The Role of Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging in Intensive Care Treatment of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Role of Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging in Intensive Care Treatment of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
2024
Overview
Background: Post-hemicraniectomy patients often need extended intensive care treatment. While computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for regular imaging, its frequent use could be linked to adverse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess bedside transcranial ultrasound (TUS) to capture intracranial anatomical structures and pathologies. Methods: We analyzed 19 patients treated in our neurosurgical ICU from 1 January 2023 to 1 February 2024. Six physicians from our unit (three residents and three attending physicians) conducted a retrospective evaluation. A total of 158 sessions, including multiple freeze frames and video footage, were analyzed, including 7 imaging categories, using a Likert scale. Subsequently, correlation between CT and TUS was evaluated for midline (ML) shift, subdural space, lateral ventricular width (LVW), and extent of intracerebral hematoma using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Results: TUS was performed on average on 8.32/19.53 days (mean inpatient stay). It provided the lowest Likert scores for the imaging categories ventricular system, midline, subdural space, intraventricular catheter placement, and cortical gyration. Residents reported slightly inferior assessability, resulting in higher scores on the Likert scale (0.02–0.93 mean difference compared with attending physicians). A high correlation was shown in terms of ML shift, LVW, and intracerebral hematomas. No relevant correlation was shown in subdural space. Conclusions: TUS is a safe, cost-, and time-efficient method, potentially gaining relevance for imaging post-hemicraniectomy patients. In our setting, the method seemed effective in depicting intraventricular catheter placement, hydrocephalus, ML shift, and space-occupying lesions. Further improvement in image quality could potentially reduce the overall number of indicated CT scans.
