Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Feasibility and procedure-related patient discomfort of peripheral venous access for coronary sinus cannulation during electrophysiology procedures
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Feasibility and procedure-related patient discomfort of peripheral venous access for coronary sinus cannulation during electrophysiology procedures
Do you wish to request the book?
Feasibility and procedure-related patient discomfort of peripheral venous access for coronary sinus cannulation during electrophysiology procedures
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Feasibility and procedure-related patient discomfort of peripheral venous access for coronary sinus cannulation during electrophysiology procedures
2012
Overview
Background
Placement of an electrode catheter in the coronary sinus (CS) through the jugular or subclavian vein, as part of electrophysiology (EP) procedures, increases patient discomfort and the possibility of adverse events. We studied the hypothesis that peripheral venous access for CS cannulation, as part of EP procedures, is feasible and can reduce patient discomfort, eliminating central venous access-associated risks.
Methods
Consecutive patients submitted to EP procedures were randomly assigned to peripheral or central venous access for CS cannulation. If after 30 min from initial needle insertion the CS was still not catheterized, the attempt was considered unsuccessful. Patient level of discomfort was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results
Success rate was 90% in the peripheral versus 95% in the central venous access group (
p
= 1.00). No complications related to venous access were observed in the peripheral venous access group, whereas one case of pneumothorax and one case of extensive hematoma in the anterior cervical area were recorded in the central venous access group. Patients submitted to central vein catheterization reported higher VAS scores, 46.8 ± 16.3 versus 36.8 ± 12.9 (
p
= 0.04). No significant difference was observed in fluoroscopy time needed for CS cannulation (51.1 ± 9.2 s versus 51.4 ± 7.9 s;
p
= 0.71) between the two groups.
Conclusion
This small, randomized study indicates that peripheral venous access for CS catheter placement during EP procedures is feasible, with equivalent success rate to the central venous access approach, and associated with lower levels of self-reported patient discomfort.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
