Journal Article

Submentalizing: I Am Not Really Reading Your Mind

Heyes, Cecilia

2014

Overview

The nativist view of mentalizing—the view that humans have an inherent capacity to think about the mental states of others—has been recently reinvigorated by reports that adults and infants automatically represent mental states—that they engage in implicit mentalizing. In this article, I take a close look at the strongest evidence of implicit mentalizing in adults, which suggests that people automatically represent what others see, intend, and believe. I argue that although these experiments have been ingeniously designed and carefully implemented, they do not provide evidence of implicit mentalizing because their results could be due instead to submentalizing—domain-general cognitive mechanisms that simulate the effects of mentalizing in social contexts. These include the processes that mediate involuntary attentional orienting, spatial coding of response locations, object-centered spatial coding of stimulus locations, retroactive interference, and distraction. If my analysis is correct, it suggests that the same domain-general processes can provide a fast and efficient alternative to mentalizing in everyday life, allowing people to navigate a wide range of social situations without thinking about mental states. Thus, submentalizing could be both a substrate and a substitute for mentalizing.

• Publisher: Sage Publications,SAGE Publications
• Subject: Adults / Asperger syndrome / Attitudes / Autistic disorder / Avatars / Biological and medical sciences / Coding / Cognition / Everyday life / Experimental psychology / Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology / Language development / Memory interference / Mental states / Mind / Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry / Psychology. Psychophysiology / Social attribution, perception and cognition / Social context / Social psychology / Social situations / Thought processes