Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions
by
Schmeets, Hans
, Bader, Max
in
Bias
/ Credibility
/ Election Monitoring
/ Elections
/ Europe
/ International Organizations
/ Opinion Polls
/ Weighting
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions
by
Schmeets, Hans
, Bader, Max
in
Bias
/ Credibility
/ Election Monitoring
/ Elections
/ Europe
/ International Organizations
/ Opinion Polls
/ Weighting
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions
Journal Article
Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
While international election observations missions often aim to present
generalizable claims about the quality and integrity of an election, their
findings are rarely based on a representative sample of observations,
undermining the credibility of the missions. Bias in the selection of polling
stations, among other things, can inflate or deflate the percentage of polling
stations where observers find significant flaws. This article uses original data
from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) election
observation missions to illustrate the nature of the problem of selection bias
in international election observation, and show how the percentage of ‘bad’
polling stations (in the absence of selection bias) can be estimated through a
weighting procedure. The article finds that, while there is a strong degree of
selection bias, this does not significantly impact the overall percentage of
‘bad’ polling stations that is reported by OSCE observation missions.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,SAGE Publishing
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.