Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
An Empirical Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
An Empirical Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks
Do you wish to request the book?
An Empirical Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
An Empirical Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks
2014
Overview
The parameter
m
i
is an important rock property parameter required for use of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. The conventional method for determining
m
i
is to fit a series of triaxial compression test data. In the absence of laboratory test data, guideline charts have been provided by Hoek to estimate the
m
i
value. In the conventional Hoek–Brown failure criterion, the
m
i
value is a constant for a given rock. It is observed that using a constant
m
i
may not fit the triaxial compression test data well for some rocks. In this paper, a negative exponent empirical model is proposed to express
m
i
as a function of confinement, and this exercise leads us to a new empirical failure criterion for intact rocks. Triaxial compression test data of various rocks are used to fit parameters of this model. It is seen that the new empirical failure criterion fits the test data better than the conventional Hoek–Brown failure criterion for intact rocks. The conventional Hoek–Brown criterion fits the test data well in the high-confinement region but fails to match data well in the low-confinement and tension regions. In particular, it overestimates the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and the uniaxial tensile strength of rocks. On the other hand, curves fitted by the proposed empirical failure criterion match test data very well, and the estimated UCS and tensile strength agree well with test data.
Publisher
Springer Vienna,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
