Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study
by
Begg, Rachel
, Loveday, Thomas
, Baysari, Melissa
, Awad, Selvana
, Baillie, Andrew
in
Adult
/ Electronic health records
/ Ergonomics
/ Ergonomics - methods
/ Ergonomics - standards
/ Female
/ Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Interviews as Topic
/ Male
/ Medical errors
/ Methods
/ Methods in Human Factors Research
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Paper
/ Patient safety
/ Qualitative Research
/ Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Human Factors
/ Usability
/ User Needs and Competencies
/ Validity
2026
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study
by
Begg, Rachel
, Loveday, Thomas
, Baysari, Melissa
, Awad, Selvana
, Baillie, Andrew
in
Adult
/ Electronic health records
/ Ergonomics
/ Ergonomics - methods
/ Ergonomics - standards
/ Female
/ Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Interviews as Topic
/ Male
/ Medical errors
/ Methods
/ Methods in Human Factors Research
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Paper
/ Patient safety
/ Qualitative Research
/ Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Human Factors
/ Usability
/ User Needs and Competencies
/ Validity
2026
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study
by
Begg, Rachel
, Loveday, Thomas
, Baysari, Melissa
, Awad, Selvana
, Baillie, Andrew
in
Adult
/ Electronic health records
/ Ergonomics
/ Ergonomics - methods
/ Ergonomics - standards
/ Female
/ Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Interviews as Topic
/ Male
/ Medical errors
/ Methods
/ Methods in Human Factors Research
/ Middle Aged
/ Original Paper
/ Patient safety
/ Qualitative Research
/ Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Human Factors
/ Usability
/ User Needs and Competencies
/ Validity
2026
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study
Journal Article
Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study
2026
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Human factors (HF), or ergonomics, which explores the interaction between humans and systems, has been used to support design in safety-critical industries such as aviation, transportation, nuclear power, and manufacturing. HF methods have the potential to support the safe design of health IT; however, the evaluation of HF methods to determine their effectiveness and feasibility in this context has been limited.
The aim of this study was to identify criteria for evaluating HF methods when applied to real-world projects and to use these to propose a framework for method evaluation.
The study design was qualitative and descriptive and involved semistructured interviews with HF experts working across health and nonhealth industries in academic and/or practitioner roles. HF experts held a relevant degree (eg, ergonomics and HF engineering) and were actively using their HF expertise. Results were thematically analyzed.
A total of 21 participants took part, and interviews lasted, on average, 52 (range 39-103) minutes. Participants mentioned that they did not routinely evaluate methods; however, when asked how they would evaluate methods, they outlined a range of criteria to support method evaluation. Overall, 5 criteria and 28 subcriteria were identified. High-level criteria included effectiveness, efficiency, ease of use and acceptability, and impact on the solution.
Results from this study were used to propose a framework for evaluating HF methods used in real-world health IT projects. The framework should provide organizations with valuable information on how to optimize the application and outcomes of HF methods and build HF capability within organizations, particularly where this capability may be lacking.
Publisher
JMIR Publications,JMIR Publications Inc
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.