Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessing Language Skills in Children Aged 4 to 6 Years with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessing Language Skills in Children Aged 4 to 6 Years with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessing Language Skills in Children Aged 4 to 6 Years with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Assessing Language Skills in Children Aged 4 to 6 Years with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study
2025
Overview
Background/Objectives: Language impairments are highly prevalent in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). In preschoolers (3–6 years), language development predicts future social outcomes. Despite the availability of standardized tests for typically developing children, few studies have specifically examined language impairments in preschool-aged children with ASD using these tools. This study aimed to comprehensively assess receptive and expressive lexicon, receptive comprehension, phonology and articulation using standardized tools, and to evaluate their feasibility. A secondary goal was to compare the results obtained with standardized tests to those from developmental batteries and hetero-assessments (caregiver reports). Methods: Forty-seven children with ASD aged 4 to 6 years participated. Assessments included standardized language tests, developmental batteries and hetero-assessments. The dichotomous Rasch model evaluated feasibility and item performance of standardized tests. Concordance across methods was analyzed via Pearson correlations and stepwise linear regression. Results: Standardized assessments were feasible for most participants despite wide variability in language abilities. Partial but non-equivalent concordance was found among assessment methods, each providing complementary insights into language profiles. Conclusions: Combining multiple assessment methods is crucial to capture the complexity of language development in children with ASD. Standardized tests can be adapted and provide more precise profiles than developmental batteries or hetero-assessments alone. A multimodal approach is essential to accurately identify language strengths and therapeutic targets in preschool-aged children with ASD.
